By clicking on the "Accept & Close" button, you provide your explicit consent to the processing of your data to achieve the above goal.
A Democratic congressman who happens to have the ultra-secret National Security Agency in his district is bringing back the highly controversial Cyber Intelligence Sharing and Protection Act (CISPA), the bill that makes it easier for the NSA to find out who you’re talking to and for how long.
Maryland Rep. C. A. "Dutch" Ruppersberger at a military test facility.
And you can thank the Sony hack for bringing the anti-privacy CISPA back.
“The reason I’m putting this bill in now is I want to keep the momentum going on what’s happening out there in the world,” Maryland Congressman Dutch Ruppersberger told The Hill paper, referring of course to the recent email hack of entertainment giant Sony.
The FBI blames North Korea for the hack even though a number of cybersecurity experts believe it was probably an inside job.
CISPA is all about getting tech and telecommunications companies to hand over data on its users to the government. Sony isn’t one of those kinds of companies like Verizon or Sprint, for instance, and it’s unlikely the NSA would have been able to find the perpetrators even if the company opened their computers to the spy agency. But a computer hack is the perfect opportunity to bring back an onerous bill like CISPA, and this time around it looks like the White House might get on board.
As part of his preview of the State of the Union address later this month, President Obama has been rolling out proposals he’ll outline further during his first speech to Congress since the Republican takeover, and one of them involves legislative proposals and executive actions the White House says will look at cybersecurity measures to protect against cyberattacks and identity thefts.
Officials say such recommendations will help boost confidence in technology, but so far have not provided further details. This coming week the president will also meet with members of Congress to talk about national security issues – which could include a discussion on legislative measures such as the one resurrected by Ruppersberger — and Obama will also visit the Department of Homeland Security’s cybersecurity offices to talk about how government agencies and companies can better cooperate in sharing information to combat threats online.
Ironically, Obama threatened to veto the CISPA bill when it was first introduced, but apparently a big email hacking making the news changes everything.
The fact of registration and authorization of users on Sputnik websites via users’ account or accounts on social networks indicates acceptance of these rules.
Users are obliged abide by national and international laws. Users are obliged to speak respectfully to the other participants in the discussion, readers and individuals referenced in the posts.
The websites’ administration has the right to delete comments made in languages other than the language of the majority of the websites’ content.
In all language versions of the sputniknews.com websites any comments posted can be edited.
A user comment will be deleted if it:
does not correspond with the subject of the post;
promotes hatred and discrimination on racial, ethnic, sexual, religious or social basis or violates the rights of minorities;
violates the rights of minors, causing them harm in any form, including moral damage;
contains ideas of extremist nature or calls for other illegal activities;
contains insults, threats to other users, individuals or specific organizations, denigrates dignity or undermines business reputations;
contains insults or messages expressing disrespect to Sputnik;
violates privacy, distributes personal data of third parties without their consent or violates privacy of correspondence;
describes or references scenes of violence, cruelty to animals;
contains information about methods of suicide, incites to commit suicide;
pursues commercial objectives, contains improper advertising, unlawful political advertisement or links to other online resources containing such information;
promotes products or services of third parties without proper authorization;
contains offensive language or profanity and its derivatives, as well as hints of the use of lexical items falling within this definition;
contains spam, advertises spamming, mass mailing services and promotes get-rich-quick schemes;
promotes the use of narcotic / psychotropic substances, provides information on their production and use;
contains links to viruses and malicious software;
is part of an organized action involving large volumes of comments with identical or similar content ("flash mob");
“floods” the discussion thread with a large number of incoherent or irrelevant messages;
violates etiquette, exhibiting any form of aggressive, humiliating or abusive behavior ("trolling");
doesn’t follow standard rules of the English language, for example, is typed fully or mostly in capital letters or isn’t broken down into sentences.
The administration has the right to block a user’s access to the page or delete a user’s account without notice if the user is in violation of these rules or if behavior indicating said violation is detected.