20:38 GMT13 June 2021
Listen Live
    UK
    Get short URL
    212
    Subscribe

    The British Fur Trade Association warned the government that there was no majority support for denying consumers the "choice" of real fur clothing while increasing demand for polluting crude oil-based synthetic substitutes.

    Leaders of the UK's fur trade have warned that government plans to ban imports and sales would cost thousands of jobs without improving animal welfare.

    The British Fur Trade Association said proposed new animal welfare law that would laid out in Tuesday's Queen's Speech would result in business closures, including small firms and sole traders, and reduce consumer choice — pointing out that environment secretary George Eustice had admitted as much.

    “Banning natural fur sales in the UK would do nothing to improve animal welfare, as George Eustice himself has previously stated, but would lead to a whole series of damaging consequences," association Chairman Frank Zilberkweit insisted.

    "The last thing we need is the Government acting as the wardrobe police and telling people what they can and cannot wear because of the pressure exerted on them by a small, unrepresentative group of animal rights activists.”

    Zilberkweit said the industry was already "highly regulated" and subject to strict animal welfare laws.

    "A ban would be unenforceable, encourage fur from unregulated sources, boost sales of non-renewable oil based ‘fast fashions’, shut legal businesses, cost thousands of UK jobs, threaten trade deals with fur producing and manufacturing countries and diminish personal choice,” he warned.

    The industry spokesman claimed there was no majority in Parliament or the country for a fur ban, adding: "the majority of Brits do not believe it should be for Government to decide what they should and should not wear in what would be gross invasion of their privacy."

    Tags:
    George Eustice, Boris Johnson, Queen's Speech, fur industry, Animal Cruelty, animal welfare, Animal Rights
    Community standardsDiscussion