19:18 GMT21 October 2020
Listen Live
    Get short URL
    Britain and EU After Brexit (118)

    Pro-EU "Remain" voters from the UK science industry are said to have been very concerned at the prospect of Brexit during the referendum vote earlier this year and according to a survey conducted by a campaign group, the result almost immediately had a negative effect.

    Scientists for EU, is a campaign that formed in response to the possibility of a UK Brexit and the perceived impact it would have on UK's science industry. The initial motivations for providing a collective voice on behalf of a world-leading industry have since proven to be even more important and the next phase for the group is very much about damage limitation.

    At a lecture held in London this week, Dr. Mike Galsworthy, who helped initiate the Scientists for EU campaign, spoke about what the remit of the campaign has become, following the UK's vote to leave the EU.

    Dr. Mike Galsworthy at the 'The State of Science Post-Brexit' lecture held in London
    © Sputnik /
    Dr. Mike Galsworthy at the 'The State of Science Post-Brexit' lecture held in London

    "We are continuing our duty to put the UK's knowledge economy back on the front foot for the UK Government. In the overall hierarchy of national needs, science may be seen as a little lower down in terms of national priorities, but the industry will always require long-term investment to maintain its status as a world-leading superpower," Dr. Galsworthy said.

    One week after the referendum result, the campaign group launched an open survey for research fraternities and other factions of the science industry so they could share any immediate impacts from the vote.

    Early submissions have already indicated a number of concerns shared by others in the science field, ranging from restrictions on funding avenues, limiting opportunities and problems such as visa applications for students and researchers, as well as general travel complications as a result of the UK exiting the EU.

    "The UK has almost overnight become less attractive as a place to do science," Dr. Galsworthy said.

    He went to add: "a key reason is cultural, but equally if not more crucially is funding related with issues such as competition for EU funding likely to get more cut-throat and less in favor of the UK.

    "A surge in xenophobia nationwide has also made many foreigners in the UK science base feel less welcome and very uncertain about their future rights."

    But it's not all doom and gloom and the Scientists for EU campaign is now very much about proposing a step-by-step plan for the UK Government to consider as part of post-Brexit damage limitation.

    "Since commencing our campaign we have been able to devise an 8-point action plan. This covers areas such as the need for increased funding and ensuring the UK is able to retain access to EU science programs. We are also addressing the dangers of over-regulation of our sectors and the scarcity factors likely to put us in more competition with our EU neighbors," Dr Galsworthy explained.

    State of Worry

    But Brexit has left many industries in a state of worry about their future and this is understandable, when resources are set to be scarce.

    The government is being forced to be quite selective about where future funding will go and advocates such as Dr. Galsworthy are simply taking action to ensure UK's world-leading science industry doesn't get overlooked.

    Britain and EU After Brexit (118)


    UK Researchers Left Out of EU Projects as Brexit Raises Funding Concerns
    EU v AI: New European Regulation Could Anger Tech Big Shots
    Brexit: UK to Face Cuts in Research Funds, Increased Fees for EU Students
    financial damage, impact, event, government, funding, industry, science, Britain's EU referendum, Brexit, Great Britain, Europe, United Kingdom
    Community standardsDiscussion