08:24 GMT +328 September 2016
Live
Russian Interior Ministry troops during a tactical exercise held in Simferopol District

Securing Interests: Russia Could Deploy Ground Troops to Crimea 'if Needed'

© Sputnik/ Taras Litvinenko
Russia
Get short URL
126963703

Amid the rising number of threats, such as NATO’s expansion and Ukraine’s irredentism in the Black Sea region, Russia is building up its military capabilities in Crimea, including the possible deployment of ground troops to the peninsula.

Currently, there are no troops or units of the Russian Ground Forces in Crimea, Commander Col. Gen. Oleg Salyukov said Friday.

"Only troops and units of the Russian Black Sea Fleet have been deployed to the Peninsula," he was quoted as saying by TV channel Zvezda.

Meanwhile, Salyukov added that if the task is set ground troops will be deployed to Crimea. But currently, all military tasks are completed by troops of the Black Sea Fleet.

Since the day the fleet was founded back in 1783, Crimea, particularly the city of Sevastopol, has been its home. After the collapse of the Soviet Union and until Crimea’s reunification with Russia in 2014, Moscow operated the fleet only in accordance to the agreement with Ukraine on the fleet’s status.

After the Crimean referendum in March 2014, Russia was able to upgrade its naval forces in Crimea, as part of the military modernization plan until 2020.

Providing military security as well as creating a full-fledged task force in the peninsula has been named among the top priorities for Russia’s Southern Military District.

The twenty years of the Black Sea Fleet’s decay under Ukrainian rule led to a significant build-up of the US presence in the region. And, what is more, after Crimea reunited with Russia, Moscow faced a growing number of challenges, especially from the continuously expanding NATO near its borders. From this point of view, the decision to invest a large amount of resources to secure Crimea is more than logical.

After the pro-Russian government of Viktor Yanukovych was toppled in February 2014, the new government took the course on joining NATO. In September 2015, Kiev unveiled its new military doctrine, aimed at deepening NATO-Ukraine cooperation and achieving compatibility between their armed forces by 2020.

The new government has repeatedly said they were ready to take steps to take Crimea back to Ukraine, and these steps may not only be diplomatic in nature. History has seen numerous examples of revanchist mottos turning into actions, including military actions.

What is more, recently, Ukraine and Turkey discussed building military cooperation, including establishing a partnership to maintain peace and security in the Black Sea region.

According to military experts, despite the fact that Russian ground troops have not been deployed to Crimea, the number of other military units the region is highly secured and protected by advanced weapons, including the newest warships, warplanes, submarines and air-defenses. If necessary, units of the Ground Forces can easily be deployed to the peninsula, including mechanized infantry, armored forces, artillery, engineering and signals troops.  

Related:
Are Erdogan's Grey Wolves Terrorists Knocking on Crimea's Door?
Is Kiev Using Russia-Turkey Tensions to Trouble Crimea?
Ukraine, Turkey Agree to Ramp Up Military Cooperation in Black Sea
Russian Warships Equipped With Kalibr Missiles Join Black Sea Fleet
Tags:
NATO, military, defense, Russian Black Sea Fleet, Russian Navy, Crimea, Ukraine, Russia, Black Sea, Sevastopol
Community standardsDiscussion
Comment via FacebookComment via Sputnik
  • Сomment

All comments

  • Well send troops anyway just to show you're here.....they will fly away like the uss MC donald!
  • FlorianGeyer
    Order the Russian troops to wear trainers not boots and then Russia can truthfully say they only have trainers on the ground, not boots.
  • in reply toFlorianGeyer(Show commentHide comment)
    FlorianGeyer, Nice pun. I guess even in flip-flop the gi's would run away from them.
  • marcanhalt
    As much as I hate the taste of "war" coming out of my mouth, I would like to see the Right Sector get their asses kicked by trying any kind of foolish entry into Crimea. It is strange that they have been silent, and I do understand the need for them to be reined in by the their State military command, but that has not stopped them from making their presence still known. And nothing would please me more than seeing them crying like spoiled babies, in front of the cameras, much like the riverine boat crowd in the Persian Gulf. "Where's your bravado these days, boys?" Their silent withdrawal is further proof, to me, that the Maidan affair was a fixed and planned coup. That does make this present government more illegal.
  • FlorianGeyerin reply to (Show commentHide comment)
    Jet fuel can't melt steel beams,
    I leave 'flip flops' to the American military !
  • in reply tomarcanhalt(Show commentHide comment)
    marcanhalt, The MSM will change the story and pravy sector would be depicted as "ukrainians saving families from the bad russians soldiers who eat babies" as usual. I guess it's better the way it is.
  • peaceactivist2
    If I am Predident Putin not just sending troops to protect Crimear, but I cut Ukrain in half along the river. This way, Russia has a more straight and nicer looking border. Plus it also protecting all Russia speaking east residents. Russia better prepared as invasion plans are writing/erasing/writing/erasing on the brainstorm board!
  • innocappuccinnoin reply to (Show commentHide comment)
    Jet fuel can't melt steel beams, but russians really do eat babies! it is atested by european counsulary documents centuries ago! it is no secret that russians allways eat babies. and they cook them too, and drink their blood, then they execute them as enemy of the people. then they make them wear ushanka. it is just how spiteful they are!
  • Ann in reply tomarcanhalt(Show commentHide comment)
    marcanhalt, You can't get much more illegal, regardless of what the right sector does/doesn't do.
  • Ann in reply topeaceactivist2(Show commentHide comment)
    peaceactivist2, "This way, Russia has a more straight and nicer looking border" - Would you consider that "cosmetic improvements" then?
Show new comments (0)
Top stories