17:20 GMT07 April 2020
Listen Live

    Why Only Sanders Can Prevent 'President Trump'

    The BradСast
    Get short URL
    by
    0 32
    Subscribe

    Today we examine the reported results of Hillary's huge victory over Bernie Sanders in South Carolina over the weekend: What do they mean? Can the results be "trusted"? Are corporate media such as NY Times and Washington Post misleading Americans about what the current numbers, including the Democratic Party delegate count, actually suggest?

    Then, I'm joined by Current Affairs magazine editor Nathan J. Robinson to discuss his recent feature article which makes the case that "unless the Democrats run Sanders, a Trump nomination means a Trump Presidency". Robinson, an attorney, Harvard PhD student and children's book author, offers one of the most persuasive arguments I've heard to date regarding the "electability" of Sanders versus Clinton — at least under the presumption that Trump is to be the Republicans' standard-bearer.

    "The problem with polls is that they are unable to foresee events that will occur in the future that will change the way people think," Robinson explains about perceived advantages that some see in Clinton's favor right now. "Things that happen in the campaign change people's opinions, make them more favorable to one candidate, less favorable to another." The "key point" in Robinson's calculation: Donald Trump as the GOP nominee. "That is something that the Democrats need to start thinking when they ask all these questions about electability. 'What's going to happen? Who is going to be attacked and how?' They need to be thinking in terms that Donald Trump is likely to be the nominee."

    While it's true the Right has been attacking Hillary for years — something that Sanders has yet to face — she has never come under the full withering force of Trump's particularly aggressive and personal campaign style, argues Robinson, who says he's not personally a fan of either Clinton or Sanders (or Trump, for that matter.) He details why he believes Clinton stands to be pulled under by Trump's onslaught, whereas Sanders stands a far greater chance of surviving the type of campaign that Trump has shown himself willing to wage against his Republican opponents.

    We discuss what is likely to happen in both a Trump v. Sanders and Trump v. Clinton race, how Democrats who are focused on the inevitable attacks from the Right against Sanders as a "Socialist!" may be missing a much larger concern, and how all of this calculus completely changes if someone other than Trump somehow manages to win the GOP nomination.

    Finally, the death of Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia has already had a profound effect on the Court. On Friday, Dow Chemical dropped their planned SCOTUS appeal of a $1 billion judgment against them, citing the "increased…likelihood for unfavorable outcomes for business involved in class action suits." And, today, Justice Clarence Thomas spoke up to ask questions during oral arguments at the Court for the first time in 10 years!…

    You can find Brad’s previous editions here.

    And tune in to radio Sputnik one hour a day, five days a week.

    Tags:
    Super Tuesday, FeeltheBern, USelections, SCOTUS, US election primaries, 2016 Election, 2016 US Presidential Run, GOP, The New York Times, The Washington Post, Democrats, US Supreme Court, Antonin Scalia, Ted Cruz, Marco Rubio, Chris Christie, Hillary Clinton, Bernie Sanders, Donald Trump, South Carolina, United States
    Community standardsDiscussion
    Comment via SputnikComment via Facebook