10:10 GMT31 July 2021
Listen Live

    '50 Analysts' Charge U.S. Manipulating ISIL Intel

    The BradСast
    Get short URL
    by
    0 52
    Subscribe

    NatSec journo Shane Harris on his startling Daily Beast exclusive. Also: New Presidential politics and polling news and MUCH more today...

    Today's BradCast is packed with news from top to bottom. Please buckle up before listening.

    First, Big Oil's deceptive scam in California has succeeded, for now, as Dems pull landmark legislation that would have called for a 50% cut in petroleum usage in the state.

    Then, new polling finds Bernie Sanders overtaking Hillary Clinton now in Iowa, as well as New Hampshire, while the party's internecine battle over more debates continues. On the GOP side, candidates not named Trump are flailing as they desperately try to get attention. It's not working — neither is their lost hopes of scuttling the Iran peace plan.

    Next, author and national security correspondent Shane Harris joins us to discuss his disturbing new exclusive at The Daily Beast on 50 U.S. intelligence analysts now reportedly charging that the U.S. has been "cooking" its intel on ISIL.

    The still-unnamed military intelligence analysts working for CENTCOM, as Harris explains, are reportedly seeing some of their own reports manipulated by higher-ups. "Key pieces of [their analyses] that they feel are very important [are being] taken out, not given the proper context, [and] in some cases making it look like ISIL and al Qaeda are weaker than these analysts actually believe they are."

    So are these charges akin to the way intel on Iraq and WMD was manipulated by the Bush Administration in the 2002/2003 lead-up to war, as revealed by the notorious Downing Street Memos ("the intelligence and facts were being fixed around the policy")? Or are these claims more akin to the hyperventilation over unsubstantiated allegations from the Right concerning Benghazi?

    Harris tells me his reporting suggests it is more likely the former than the latter, though it remains unclear who is behind the alleged manipulation of intel and how high up it might go, even if proven true. "What I think is notable is that these 50 — actually 52 — professionals who are doing this every day, to go against their bosses, to take this to the IG is a very bold move. They feel very strongly that they have a case," he explains. "I've never seen anything like this. Usually whistle-blowers are in ones and twos, but for a group of people en masse to complain like this is certainly unique in my experience as a reporter."

    We discuss who may be behind the alleged "cooking" of the intel and whether President Obama or the White House is somehow directing all of this as the Bush/Cheney Administration was doing in the case of the manipulated intel on Iraq. Tune in for Harris' response to those questions and many others, in what seems, at least as of now, a startling, if still-developing story.

    Finally, our latest Green News Report is also a very busy one today, and not only because it includes several fresh examples of Sarah Palin's unparalleled ignorance…

    Tags:
    California, Iraq, Bernie Sanders, Sarah Palin, Hillary Clinton, GOP, terrorism, intelligence, Daesh
    Community standardsDiscussion