05:12 GMT +318 October 2017
Live
    Syrian Democratic Forces (SDF) fighters gesture while posing on a damaged airplane inside Tabqa military airport after taking control of it from Islamic State fighters, west of Raqqa city, Syria April 9, 2017

    Washington Chose Kurds for Raqqa Op Since They 'Cost Less Than Turkish Soldiers'

    © REUTERS/ Rodi Said
    Politics
    Get short URL
    Operation to Liberate Raqqa From Daesh (61)
    41541715

    The United States tasked the Syrian Democratic Forces (SDF) with liberating the Syrian city of Raqqa instead of offering Turkey to lead the high-stakes campaign due to cost-efficiency considerations, anti-terrorism expert and former Turkish special forces operative Abdullah Agar told Sputnik Turkey.

    "Clearly, Kurdistan Workers' Party (PKK) fighters and other affiliated Kurdish militias cost much less than Turkish, let alone American soldiers. The Kurds are ready to fight for $150 per month. And Washington does not have to bear responsibility for them," the analyst explained.

    Turkey maintains that the SDF, largely made up of the People's Protection Units (YPG), and other Kurdish groups are affiliated with the Kurdistan Workers' Party, which Ankara views as a terrorist organization. As a result, Turkey is fiercely opposed to anything that could empower the Kurds, including military support.

    Abdullah Agar said that Washington's decision to arm the SDF as they brace to liberate Raqqa, Daesh's last major urban stronghold, did not come out of the blue.

    It is "not a novel phenomenon," he said. "The United States has sent heavy armaments to the Kurds since Daesh unleashed chaos in Syria. I think that there is a more important aspect to this story. It is the fact that the White House made an official decision to send arms directly to the Kurds that matters."

    Washington's decision has strategic political implications, the analyst added, citing Iraq as a prime case in point.

    "At first, armed Kurdish militias in northern Iraq received weapons through the central Iraqi government. As soon as they began receiving weapons directly from Washington, they started talking about potential independence of northern Iraqi provinces with predominantly Kurdish population. I think the same is true of Syria. In other words, Washington's decision to arm the YPG is aimed at reaching political objectives, which ultimately entail splitting Syria," he suggested.

    Abdullah Agar emphasized that Ankara would not support such plans.

    "Turkey is opposed to this scenario. This is why it is an unfavorable and unwelcome partner for the United States. On the other hand, the US understands that if Turkey takes part in the operation aimed at liberating Raqqa, then Washington will have to allow Ankara to be pro-active to a certain extent. As a result, Turkey would improve its standing in the region at the expense of Washington's plans and ambitions in the Middle East," he said.

    Never miss a story again — sign up to our Telegram channel and we'll keep you up to speed!

    Topic:
    Operation to Liberate Raqqa From Daesh (61)

    Related:

    Majority of Turks Regard US as Foe After Washington Decision to Arm Syrian Kurds
    Erdogan Wants to Change Trump’s Mind on Arming Kurds, But Will it Work?
    Life After Daesh: Could Middle East Soon See New Kurdish State Against All Odds?
    US' Variant of Russia's Hmeymim? What Washington Has in Mind for Syria
    Tags:
    Syrian Kurds, military assistance, military spending, military operation, Syrian Democratic Forces (SDF), Abdullah Agar, Turkey, Syria, United States, Raqqa
    Community standardsDiscussion
    Comment via FacebookComment via Sputnik
    • Сomment