17:11 GMT26 February 2020
Listen Live
    Get short URL

    The Trump administration's ambiguous attitude toward the EU and NATO poses a challenge to the unity of the Western world, Japanese academic Hiroshi Nakanishi noted in his article for Sankei Shimbun, expressing his concerns regarding the fact that Trump's foreign policy agenda is still shrouded in fog.

    Donald Trump's foreign strategy and NATO policy still leave more questions than answers, Professor Hiroshi Nakanishi of Kyoto University notes in his article for Sankei Shimbun.

    "Although more than a month has passed since Donald Trump assumed the office, his foreign strategy remains shrouded in fog," Professor Nakanishi underscored.

    According to the Japanese academic, in addition to the belated appointments in the Trump cabinet, there is also the problem of leadership within his team.

    "The Secretary of Defense [James Mattis] and Secretary of State [Rex Tillerson] belong to the major wing of the Republican Party, but President Trump's associates have adopted a 'radical' position, seeking to reshuffle the existing order," he suggested.

    This controversy could have been at the root of the Trump administration's seemingly inconsistent position towards US allies and the NATO bloc.

    To illustrate his point, Nakanishi drew attention to Vice President Michael Pence and Secretary of Defense Mattis' visit to Europe in mid-February. The US officials took part in a NATO Summit in Brussels and a security conference in Munich.

    One may say that the reaction of the Europeans to their messages was ambiguous: some calmed down, while the others got visibly agitated, the professor noted.

    The US officials underscored the importance of NATO, in some sense contradicting Trump's earlier statement that the Alliance was an obsolete organization.

    At the same time, however, Mattis and Pence demanded that the European NATO member states increased their defense spending.

    Commenting on the matter, Nakanishi noted that, as of yet, only a few European countries have met the  goal of spending 2% of their GDP on the Alliance. In spending 3.5% of their GDP on the bloc's needs the US still bears the main financial burden.

    Although Washington's arguments looked fair, there was rather modest applause for the suggestion from Pence to increase the defense spending, the academic noted.

    U.S. soldiers stand next to the M1 Abrams tanks that will be deployed in Latvia for NATO's Operation Atlantic Resolve in Garkalne, Latvia February 8, 2017
    © REUTERS / Ints Kalnins
    U.S. soldiers stand next to the M1 Abrams tanks that will be deployed in Latvia for NATO's Operation Atlantic Resolve in Garkalne, Latvia February 8, 2017

    "However, the problem is not only in the defense budget. Mattis and Tillerson criticized Russia, but did not deny the possibility of reviewing US policy towards Moscow. They highlighted the role of NATO in the Middle East, but did not outline concrete measures [the Alliance should take in the region]," Nakanishi stressed.

    "Such an ambiguity is the result of the fragmentation of foreign policy ideas in US power circles," he believes.

    There is yet another problem: the academic expressed concerns about the Trump administration's attitude toward the European Union. Following the Second World War Washington supported the idea of creating a unified European space.

    While the Republicans continue to follow this course, Trump and his associates never miss a chance to criticize the bloc and openly praise the UK's decision to leave the EU.

     The academic noted that Trump's contradictions with Europe may also have serious implications for Japan. Tokyo should not be too optimistic about the future of US-Japanese relations, he warned, adding that Japan needs to team up with European leaders and work out common strategic goals with the EU.

    Rossiya Segodnya's political commentator Dmitri Kosyrev doesn't share Nakanishi's pessimism.

    In his February op-ed for RIA Novosti Kosyrev pointed out the differences in Trump's approach toward his European and Asian Pacific allies.

    The Russian political analyst pointed out that the Trump administration is seeking to bolster its Asian Pacific alliances as a counterweight to China, Washington's major economic and geopolitical competitor in the region.

    "In fact, we can say that Trump has begun his real foreign policy by establishing the system of relations around China, the main geopolitical rival [of the US]. Europeans and their ideological allies can wait," Kosyrev wrote.


    EU Can Wait: Trump's Up to Something 'Big' in Asia Pacific
    Effective EU-US Economic Ties Possible Without TTIP - Hofer
    Going Back on Trump's Words: Will US Regain Trust of EU Allies After Munich?
    Trump's 'Mixed Signals' on Crimea Have EU Stumped and Intrigued
    EU Concerned by Trump's Financial Deregulation Efforts
    US defense spending, US foreign policy, Munich Security Conference, World War II, NATO, European Union, Stephen Bannon, James Mattis, Mike Pence, Donald Trump, Asia-Pacific, Germany, China, Europe, Japan, United States, Brussels
    Community standardsDiscussion
    Comment via SputnikComment via Facebook