11:18 GMT14 August 2020
Listen Live
    Get short URL
    0 48

    The Turkish Parliament adopted the main and most debated articles of a controversial constitutional reform package that stipulates a transition to a presidential system of governance, local media reported Friday.

    MOSCOW (Sputnik) According to the Anadolu news agency, the provisions in question are articles 7 and 8.

    Article 7 deals with the requirements for a presidential candidate, such as his age, education and citizenship. The provision also lifts the restrictions currently imposed on the president to have links with a political party. The article has sparked concerns over the potential effect it would have on the leader’s “impartiality.”

    The voting on the article was reportedly held late on Thursday and it was passed with 340 of the 550 lawmakers.

    At the same time, Article 8 stipulates that the president will have the powers to appoint and dismiss ministers. The parliament approved the provision early on Friday, the media reported, adding that it passed 340 – 135.

    Voting on the remaining 10 articles is set to continue through the day.

    If the entire package is adopted with the approval of at least 330 lawmakers, a national referendum will be held on the issue. However, if 367 or more lawmakers support the bill, it can be passed into law without a referendum.

    Mustafa Sentop, a member of the ruling Justice and Development Party (AKP), said Thursday that if the Grand National Assembly fails to adopt the constitutional amendments to switch to a presidential system of governance, Turkey may hold early parliamentary election this year.

    Never miss a story again — sign up to our Telegram channel and we'll keep you up to speed!


    Turkish Police Dispersing Protests Against Constitutional Changes in Ankara
    Turkey's Ruling AKP Submits Constitutional Amendments to Parliament
    Draft of Turkey's New Constitution to Be Submitted to Parliament Friday
    presidential candidate, constitutional reform, Turkey
    Community standardsDiscussion