07:21 GMT +321 July 2019
Listen Live
    US Democratic presidential nominee Hillary Clinton in Tempe, Arizona, on November 2, 2016 and US Republican Presidential nominee Donald Trump in Warren, Michigan on October 31, 2016.

    Federal Court Invites Trump’s Attorney General to Probe Clinton Email Case

    © AFP 2019 / JEFF KOWALSKY JEWEL SAMAD
    Politics
    Get short URL
    11342

    A federal court has ruled that President-elect Donald Trump’s Attorney General pick, Jeff Sessions, will have the opportunity to get involved in Hillary Clinton’s ongoing email case.

    On Tuesday, a three-judge panel in the Circuit Court of Appeals ruled unanimously that a lower court made a bad ruling when it threw out lawsuits attempting to force the release of additional Clinton emails documenting her tenure as US Secretary of State.

    Two separate lawsuits, filed by Judicial Watch and Cause of Action, asked for the email issue to be referred to the Justice Department. The lower court had previously ruled that the lawsuits were moot, as the Department of State’s review of the Clinton emails was sufficient.

    "Even though those efforts bore some fruit, the Department has not explained why shaking the tree harder — e.g., by following the statutory mandate to seek action by the Attorney General — might not bear more still. It is therefore abundantly clear that, in terms of assuring government recovery of emails, appellants have not 'been given everything [they] asked for,'" the court ruled. "Absent a showing that the requested enforcement action could not shake loose a few more emails, the case is not moot."

    US Secretary of State John Kerry previously declined to refer the matter to the attorney general, even though it is required by federal law. His decision allowed State Department officials to choose which emails they believed should be released to the public.

    “The appeals court ruling stops short of ordering the district court to force State to make the Federal Records Act referral to the Justice Department, leaving the possibility the cases could be dismissed on other grounds before such a directive is issued. DC Circuit judges also indicated they were not taking a position on whether the attorney general would be required to sue if presented with a referral on the issue,” Politico reported.

    Judicial Watch president Tom Fitton said in a statement that he believes that the court is “fed up” with the Obama administration refusing to enforce the rule of law, in regards to the Clinton email scandal.

    “Today’s appeals court ruling rejects the Obama State Department’s excuses justifying its failure to ask the attorney general, as the law requires, to pursue the recovery of the Clinton emails,” Fitton said in a statement regarding the court’s decision.

    While promises to prosecute Clinton was a rallying cry for the Trump campaign, the President-elect has since walked back his statements, saying that prosecuting the former Secretary of State is not a priority. His statements did not rule out his Justice Department continuing an investigation and making legal recommendations.

    In 2017, the Department of Justice will decide whether they wish to become embroiled in the email case.

    Related:

    Advocacy Group Challenges US State Department Hold on 30 Clinton Emails
    FBI's Renewed Probe Into Clinton's Emails Resulted in Hillary Losing Presidency
    WikiLeaks Releases 36th Batch of Clinton Campaign Chair Podesta's Leaked Emails
    WikiLeaks Dumps 35th Batch of Clinton Campaign Chair Podesta's Emails
    Criminal Investigation Into Clinton's Emails 'Far From Being Over'
    Tags:
    Email Scandal, Cause of Action, Judicial Watch, State Department, Hillary Clinton, John Kerry, Donald Trump
    Community standardsDiscussion
    Comment via FacebookComment via Sputnik