01:34 GMT +318 June 2019
Listen Live
    An Iraqi Federal Police vehicle passes through a checkpoint in Qayara, some 50 kilometers south of Mosul, Iraq, Wednesday, Oct. 26, 2016.

    What's the Rush: Pentagon Waging 'Strange War' in Mosul and Raqqa

    © AP Photo / Marko Drobnjakovic
    Politics
    Get short URL
    22798

    The Pentagon is capable of conducting simultaneous operations in Mosul and Raqqa, US defense chief Ashton Carter asserted, but journalist Svetlana Kalmykova said that the anti-Daesh offensive in Syria will hardly help to speed things up in Iraq at a time when the operation for Mosul has "floundered," fueling doubts over Washington's "true goals."

    "From the strategic point of view, an offensive in Syria will not help the coalition secure the victory over terrorists in Iraq sooner. But this will allow [Washington] to justify increasing Western military presence on the Syrian territory. By the way, without the authorization from Damascus," she wrote in an opinion piece for Sputnik in a piece titled "Neither Here nor There: America's 'Strange War' in Mosul and Raqqa."

    On Wednesday, US Secretary of Defense Ashton Carter confirmed that an operation aimed at liberating Raqqa, the so-called capital of Daesh's caliphate, will begin in weeks. The campaign is scheduled to be launched in 2016. This plan, according to Carter, has been in place for months. "We will be capable of resourcing both," he claimed.

    Kalmykova pointed to a second possible reason behind the Pentagon's decision to rush into Raqqa.

    The United States, she said, is trying to "secure a firmer footing in Syria at a time when al-Nusra Front and similar organizations are under threat of being destroyed. They are desperately fighting against the advancing Syrian Arab Army in Aleppo."

    The journalist further mentioned a point made earlier by defense analyst Konstantin Sivkov, President of the Academy of Geopolitical Problems, in an interview with Radio Sputnik. He said that what some perceive as Washington's mistakes in Syria and Iraq are in fact "planned" steps aimed at boosting US-backed radical forces.

    "It follows then that airstrikes carried out by the US and its allies by mistake are not really accidental. In any case, they necessarily lead to the militants mounting an offensive," she said.

    The Pentagon's increasing activities in Syria, Kalmykova added, could be interpreted as an admission that Washington "is extremely concerned" for US-backed rebels in Aleppo.

    "But they could also betray their sponsors, like it happened in Iraq where the militants have refused to surrender Mosul. As a result, plans to present the liberated [Iraqi] city to Hillary Clinton ahead of the presidential election have been ultimately derailed," she said.

    For his part, journalist Evgeny Krutikov pointed out that Ashton Carter was vague on details when it came to the Raqqa operation, adding that the Pentagon was apparently ready to pit Iraq and Syria against each other.

    "The US secretary of defense forgot to mention what army must invade Syria and take Raqqa under control," he wrote for Vzglyad. "Perhaps, he thinks that the Iraqi security forces or the Kurds will become cannon fodder in this operation, but these are nothing more than fantasies."

    Related:

    Secret Insurgent Tactics: Daesh May Go Underground to Survive Mosul Offensive
    Mosul Liberation to Take Three More Months - Iraqi Kurdistan President
    72-Year-Old Peshmerga Vet Fighting for Mosul With 4 Sons by His Side
    'Hotheads in Washington' Behind Plan B in Syria Miss Major Flaw of This Strategy
    Tags:
    military operation, Mosul operation, US Department of Defense (DoD), Pentagon, Ashton Carter, Mosul, Raqqa, Syria, Iraq, United States
    Community standardsDiscussion
    Comment via FacebookComment via Sputnik