01:27 GMT03 June 2020
Listen Live
    Politics
    Get short URL
    1295
    Subscribe

    The US-led airstrike on the Syrian Arab Army's base in the city of Deir ez-Zor has complicated already strained relations between Moscow and Washington as both countries, distrustful of each other and their local allies, try to salvage the fragile peace process in Syria and breathe life into the Lavrov-Kerry agreement.

    The Deir ez-Zor attack has made "the latest tenuous effort at a ceasefire/humanitarian access arrangement much more difficult to implement," Executive Director at the Center for the National Interest Paul J. Saunders asserted. In addition, it has "further [poisoned] an already profoundly mistrustful relationship between the United States and Russia, two essential participants in any settlement."

    The attack took place on September 17 when two F-16 fighter jets and two A-10 ground attack aircraft launched airstrikes against Damascus-led forces besieged by Daesh in a strategically important city of Deir ez-Zor, leaving at least 62 Syrian servicemen killed and more than 100 wounded. The incident marked the first time that the US-led coalition directly attacked Damascus-led forces.

    Russian envoy to the UN Vitaly Churkin said that the timing of the air raid was "highly suspicious," adding that "some aspects of the situation suggest that it could have well been a provocation." The United States brushed these concerns away, saying only that the attack was unintentional.
    Saunders called Washington's approach "both narcissistic and impractical."

    "Failing to address Russia's concerns in one way or another is deeply impractical for anyone looking to stop the fighting in Syria," the analyst said, adding that one of the most important steps in resolving the Syrian crisis involves focusing "on everyone's common foe, the barbaric [Daesh] forces who took advantage of Syria's instability to establish themselves as a de facto regional government."

    The Deir ez-Zor attack has also adversely affected relations between Washington and Damascus.

    "However, anyone wanting a settlement in Syria without a large-scale US intervention will need Assad's concurrence in one way or another – something we are counting on Moscow to deliver while simultaneously persuading Assad that 'he needs to go,'" Saunders added.

    This is something that Washington does not seem to be ready to admit.

    On September 12, John Kirby, a spokesperson for the US State Department, made it clear that the US was not ready to work with Assad now or in the future. "There's been no cooperation with Assad and there's not going to be cooperation with Assad," he said, adding that "we have been nothing but clear about Assad's illegitimacy."

    Related:

    Kremlin Names Conditions to Resume Syrian Ceasefire
    Pentagon 'Succeeded in Ruining' Lavrov-Kerry Deal on Syria
    Deir ez-Zor Attack: US 'Still Sees Assad as Principal Problem' in Syria
    This is Why US-Led Airstrike on Syrian Troops 'Unlikely to Have Been Accident'
    Tags:
    deal, Syrian ceasefire, Syrian crisis, Syrian conflict, Syrian Arab Army, John Kirby, Bashar al-Assad, Vitaly Churkin, Deir Ez-Zor, Syria, United States, Russia
    Community standardsDiscussion
    Comment via SputnikComment via Facebook