10:37 GMT +323 September 2019
Listen Live
    CRH high-speed train leaves the Beijing South Station for Shanghai during a test run on the Beijing-Shanghai high-speed railway in Beijing, China

    Silk Road Strategy: China Boosting Railways to Diversify Transit Lines

    © AP Photo / Alexander F. Yuan
    Politics
    Get short URL
    4376
    Subscribe

    China is boosting its railway projects as part of its comprehensive One Belt, One Road initiative; while some experts point to the fact that maritime transportation remains relatively cheaper than railroad transits, others draw attention to geostrategic goals pursued by Beijing.

    Transporting China's goods to Europe by rail is more expensive than sending them by sea; however, China is investing in the development of land routes to Europe through Kazakhstan, Mongolia and Russia pursuing certain geostrategic goals, Ivan Zuenko, a research fellow at Far Eastern Federal University, writes in his article for Carnegie Moscow Center.

    According to Zuenko, although trains deliver goods from China to Asia and Europe faster than cargo ships, the cost of railway transportation remains relatively high.

    For instance, the academic notes, it costs about $6,000 to deliver a container from China to Europe by train, six times more expensive than to transport the same container via sea lanes.

    Zuenko also draws attention to the fact that the cargo flow via land corridors amounts to just 1-2 percent of overall freight traffic.

    However, Beijing is increasing its investment in railway transportation, developing new land routes and indemnifies state companies exploiting Eurasian railroads against losses as part of its comprehensive One Road, One Belt initiative.

    For instance, in the first half of 2015 the Department of Transportation of the city of Wuhan transferred almost $4.5 million to compensate a state-owned company using the train route Wuhan-Xinjiang — Europe for losses, Zuenko remarks, adding that similar mechanisms are being implemented in other regions of China.

    "If for some reasons Beijing stops subsidizing land logistics, the prospects of its further development would become bleak," the scholar believes.

    However, Chinese media outlet Global Times argues that the railway represents a viable option for modern supply chain.

    "Due to the supply glut in the global shipping industry, shipping companies have actually slowed down their ships to cut costs, with many ships spending two months at the sea. More time at sea means companies will have to maintain larger inventories, which freezes up more of their assets and shortens the shelf life of their goods," the media outlet explained.

    The media outlet pointed out that information technology has drastically changed the way modern trade works, stressing that it is now characterized by "smaller orders, multiple dispatches and high delivery frequencies."

    For his part, John D. Schulz of Logistics Management magazine emphasizes that "the new Silk Road promises to shave weeks and perhaps thousands of dollars off each shipment, both ways, from Western Europe to China and Hong Kong. Currently by ocean that 28,000-mile round trip typically takes upwards of 30 days."

    What lies at the root of China's One Belt, One Road strategy?

    According to Zuenko, there are at least four reasons why Beijing is developing the land logistics in Eurasia.

    First, the Chinese leadership is trying to overcome a temporary slowdown in the country's economy by engaging local companies in infrastructure projects; second, Beijing is expanding its sphere of influence in the continent; third, China is interested in developing its poor western peripheries; and, finally, a network of Eurasian railroads may mitigate the potential risk of the US blocking China's sea trade.

    Indeed, global intelligence firm Strategic Forecasting, Inc. (Stratfor) noted in its 2015 analytical report that "in the case of a war between the United States and China, many US strategists favor imposing a distant blockade of Chinese waters."

    "China's economy is dependent on foreign trade, 90 percent of which travels by sea," the report stressed; "The strategy behind the Belt and Road Initiative is to diversify transit lines, thereby mitigating China's vulnerability to external economic disruption."

    The forecast takes on a new significance in the light of the US' pressure imposed on China in the South China Sea.

    In his interview with Sputnik, Mathew Maavak, geostrategic analyst and doctoral candidate in Security Foresight at Universiti Teknologi Malaysia (UTM), underscored that China's land routes, running through Russia, Mongolia and the countries of the Eurasian Economic Union (EEU) will ensure trade security and cultural exchange between the countries along the "silk roads."

    "To ensure geo-economic autarky, the RIC nations [Russia, India, China] should prioritize trade routes within their borders — to the extent possible. The safest trade routes in the near-future would look something like the China-Mongolia-Russia Economic Corridor," Maavak told Sputnik.

    Related:

    US Needs to Stop Playing 'Chicken' With Beijing in South China Sea
    China's New Silk Road Accelerates Sino-Russian Rapprochement
    US Fails to Drive a Wedge Between India and Its BRICS Partners
    Russia and China: Shifting From Neutrality to More Support in Vital Conflicts
    Tags:
    New Silk Road, trade, railway, NATO, Eurasian Economic Union, South China Sea, India, China, Europe, United States, Russia, Xinjiang
    Community standardsDiscussion
    Comment via FacebookComment via Sputnik