21:46 GMT +326 March 2017
    Russian President Vladimir Putin, second right, speak with Russian Defense Minister Sergei Shoigu, right, as he attends a meeting with top military and leaders of military industry in the Defense Ministry in in Moscow, Russia, Friday, March 11, 2016

    Pat Buchanan on the DNC Email Leak: 'Give Putin the Pulitzer Prize!'

    © Sputnik/ Mikhail Klimentyev
    Get short URL

    Commenting on the Democratic National Convention's claim that Russian intelligence was behind the leak of emails proving that the party deliberately sabotaged Senator Bernie Sanders' presidential candidacy, commentator Pat Buchanan glibly noted that if the allegations are true, it's time President Vladimir Putin be considered for a Pulitzer Prize.

    On July 22, the whistleblowing website WikiLeaks published nearly 20,000 emails from the DNC, implicating Chairwoman Debbie Wasserman-Schultz and other officials of tipping the scales against Sanders during the Democratic primary campaign.

    The leak, dubbed Emailgate 2.0, demonstrated the DNC's extreme bias in Clinton's favor, from an implied agreement to funnel money into Clinton's campaign while the primary was still going on, up to bigoted and openly anti-Semitic recommendations for Clinton's campaign based on Sanders' Jewish heritage and lack of faith in God. 

    In the fallout of the scandal, which has already forced Wasserman Shultz to resign, the Clinton campaign has chosen a campaign strategy of shooting the messenger, accusing Russian intelligence, the Russian government and Vladimir Putin personally of being behind the DNC emails hack. The motive, apparently, is Putin's desire to see businessman Donald Trump elected president.

    Naturally, Russian officials have denied Moscow's involvement, saying not only that such an approach is against Russian policy, but that US officials have absolutely no proof of their "absurd" claims. For his part, Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov issued the bluntest rebuttal to a reporter's query regarding the scandal, stating he didn't want to use profanity to comment on the ridiculous allegations.

    Unlike a majority of US political commentators, who went with the flow and accepted the Clinton campaign's stories about Russia interfering in the American election, veteran paleo-conservative commentator Pat Buchanan decided on a different approach, choosing to ride the media's wave of anti-Putin hysteria by satirically 'nominating' the Russian leader for a Pulitzer Prize.

    A cautious Trump supporter, Buchanan began by suggesting that for the Republican Party, "the tale of the thieved emails at the Democratic National Committee is just too good to be true."

    "For a year, 74-year-old socialist Bernie Sanders has been saying that, under DNC chair Debbie Wasserman Shultz, the party has been undercutting his campaign and hauling water for Hillary Clinton. From the 19,200 emails dumped the weekend before Clinton's coronation, it appears the old boy is not barking mad. The deck was stacked; the referees were in the tank; the game was rigged."

    Meanwhile, the commentator recalled, with the WikiLeaks email dump coming Friday night, "by Sunday, Clinton's crowd had unleashed the mechanical rabbit, and the press hounds were dutifully chasing it. The new party line: the Russians did it!"

    By Monday, Clinton campaign chief Robert Mook told ABC that experts were saying "that Russian state actors broke in to the DNC, took all these emails, and now they are leaking them out through the websites…some experts are now telling us that this was done by the Russians for the purpose of helping Donald Trump."

    In fact, Buchanan wrote, the current scandal reminded him of another scandal from over forty years ago.

    "In 1971, the New York Times published secret documents from the Kennedy-Johnson administration on how America got involved in Vietnam. Goal: discredit the war the Times had once supported, and undercut the war effort, now that Richard Nixon was president. The documents, many marked secret, had been illicitly taken from Defense Department files, copied, and published by the Times."

    "America's newspaper of record defended its actions by invoking 'the people's right to know' the secrets of their government." Moreover, eventually, "for publishing stolen Defense Department secrets, the Pentagon Papers, the Times got a Pulitzer Prize."

    Accordingly, Buchanan sardonically asked, "do not the people have 'a right to know' of sordid schemes of DNC operatives to sink a presidential campaign? Do the people not have a right to know that, in denying Sanders' charges, the leadership of the DNC was lying to him, lying to the party, and lying to the country?"

    As far as the supposed 'Russian trace' is concerned, the commentator noted, jokingly, that "if the Russians were helpful in bringing to the attention of the American people the anti-democratic business being done at the DNC, perhaps the Russians deserve similar recognition. By the Times' standard of 1971, maybe Putin deserves a Pulitzer."

    Turning serious, Buchanan emphasized that "undeniably, if the Russians or any foreign actors are interfering in US presidential elections, we out to know it, and stop it. But who started all this? Since the end of the Cold War, the US has used cyber warfare to sabotage centrifuges in the Iranian nuclear plant in Natanz. We have backed 'color-coded' revolutions in half-a-dozen countries from Serbia to Ukraine to Georgia – to dump rulers and regimes we do not like, all in the name of democracy."

    "Unsurprisingly, today, Russia, China, Egypt and even Israel are shutting down or booting out NGOs associated with the United States, and hacking into websites of US institutions. We were the first 'experts' to play this game. Now others know how to play it. We reap what we sow," the analyst concluded.


    Obama Admits Ignorance on Motives Behind DNC Email Leaks
    US Media Hides Real Scandal, Says ‘Trump a Manchurian Candidate for Putin’
    Trump and Those Terrible, Horrible, No Good, Very Bad Russians
    Kremlin Dismisses 'Absurd' Allegations of Russia's Involvement in DNC Hack
    'Desperation': Inside Accusations of Russia’s Involvement in DNC Scandal
    Snowden Scoffs at Accusations of Russian Hand in US Democrats' Scandal
    Trump Retorts Claims Russia Orchestrated New DNC Leaks as ‘New Joke in Town’
    bias, commentary, emailgate, email, Democratic National Convention, DNC, Donald Trump, Bernie Sanders, Hillary Clinton, Vladimir Putin, Debbie Wasserman Schultz, Pat Buchanan, Russia, United States
    Community standardsDiscussion
    Comment via FacebookComment via Sputnik
    • Сomment

    All comments

    • Robert
      President Putin deserves more than a Pulitzer, or a Nobel.
    • avatar
      Does Obama have Putin isolated yet? lol
    • avatar
      So Clinton thinks it's more likely that Putin hacked the email account than someone who supports Sanders just getting sick of her and wanting to give her trouble? Really? That's not very smart thinking.
    • choticastile
      Beautifully written expose! Love his last paragraph ....

      "Unsurprisingly, today, Russia, China, Egypt and even Israel are shutting down or booting out NGOs associated with the United States, and hacking into websites of US institutions. We were the first 'experts' to play this game. Now others know how to play it. We reap what we sow"

      Hope this serves like nothing else has done, to open the American people's eyes!
    • choticastilein reply tojas(Show commentHide comment)
      jas, Like a third rate soap-opera ... it gets worse with every subsequent episode.
    • avatar
      Corcu Liogde O'Laoghaire
      Pat could have won the presidency this time around very possibly if he had planned ahead.
      He knows what's going on. A true patriot, no question.
    • avatar
      if it is helpful, why stop it?
    • avatar
      terryjohnodgersin reply tojas(Show commentHide comment)
      jas, the 'brains' behind Obama's little forays into the world jungle lost their edge in strategic thinking when they began to think like the old KGB once did. Add to that their complete disregard for historical events, that to the initiated provide many good lessons, and what passes now for 'guidance' through that jungle while attempting to take the initiative in strategic planning and outcomes becomes what we are now witnessing today.

      A panicked reaction to Putin's very clever and strategic chess playing.
    • avatar
      mzungu in Africain reply tojas(Show commentHide comment)
      jas, He need not because Russia is "just a regional power with a weak economy".
    • choticastile
      Eudoxia, What sickens me, is how much attention the media in my country -- a BRICS country! -- showers on her every day! While in general, real people globally view the US elections as nothing but a circus, in our country they're swallowing it all hook, line and sinker -- no analyses of how it would impact our country and the rest of Africa, should Killery become the POTUS. To me its now abundantly clear, that the West has lost not only its moral compass, but its soul. How the gross of ordinary Americans can continue remaining so blind, is above all understanding. They are veritably digging their own graves -- and even do it with enthusiasm! Suppose its a case of "da insane, dey gotta no brain!"
    • avatar
      Two people who worked for the DNC were murdered in the aftermath of the DNC hack - in neither case was there a motivation for the murder. Neither was Russian. Surely, a party that does not hesitate to sabotage one of the candidates to push the other into the presidency against peoples' will, will not hesitate to kill who they fear would have more revelations to make. Which makes it pretty obvious that the DNC wasn't hacked by the Russians but by people who had enough of Democratic cheating and elitism.
    Show new comments (0)