09:26 GMT +319 September 2019
Listen Live
    The White House in Washington, D.C.

    What's Behind Washington's 'Bizarre' Focus on the 'Russian Threat'

    © Flickr/ Gage Skidmore
    Politics
    Get short URL
    Russia-NATO Relations Reach a New Low (121)
    5173
    Subscribe

    High-ranking military officials in the US and NATO have singled out Russia, not Daesh as the greatest threat to the bloc so that they would be able to maintain excessive military spending, Irish journalist Bryan MacDonald wrote for RT.

    The journalist maintained that Washington should view the brutal group, notorious for its international reach, and Islamic fundamentalism in general, as the number one threat to Western Europe. Yet policymakers in the US have remained "bizarrely" focused on Russia.

    "The main reason is because there is very little profit in combating" Daesh, he said. For MacDonald, defense officials do not view the world through the lens of peace and stability, but rather in terms of profit.

    Despite its belligerent rhetoric and assertiveness, NATO does not want to spark a war with nuclear-armed Russia, he added. Instead the bloc "desires to use Moscow as a convenient bogeyman in order to maintain US defense spending, which grew 9 percent annually from 2000-2009."

    There is an additional challenge. 

    "The simple fact is that six of the top eight defense contractors in the world are American. Together, they directly employ close to 750,000 people and that's in addition to millions of other service and supply roles that depend on their patronage," he explained.

    These are voters and lobbyists. Anyone, who will contemplate cutting these jobs, risks committing political suicide.

    "Any reduction in munitions outlay would jeopardize a lot of those jobs, creating unemployment black spots in many US towns and cities. And those would be primarily in 'blue collar' areas which have already been hollowed out by decades of outsourcing, many of which happen to be situated in electoral swing states. Any politician who'd advocate this would be self-immolating their career," the journalist explained.

    This is why the US and NATO need what he referred to as a "big ticket" opponent. But the anti-Russian stance could get the alliance into trouble, former CIA officer Philip Giraldi warned in an opinion piece for the American Conservative.

    Giraldi called Washington's policy towards Russia "misguided" and its potential implications fatal.

    "The nearly constant animosity directed against Russia by the Obama administration and likely to continue under President Clinton should be seen as madness, as the stakes in the game, a possible nuclear war, are unthinkable," he concluded.

    Topic:
    Russia-NATO Relations Reach a New Low (121)

    Related:

    Why NATO Has Begun to Resemble a Colossus With Clay Feet
    Why a Thaw Between Russia and NATO is Possible
    Sweden Lures Finland Deeper Into NATO
    NATO Mountain Troops Deploy to a Country With No Mountains
    Tags:
    US defense spending, defense industry, military spending, defense budget, NATO, Daesh, United States, Russia
    Community standardsDiscussion
    Comment via FacebookComment via Sputnik