This is What's Wrong With 'Hybrid War Paranoia' Over Russia

© Photo : Wikipedia/GURken Moscow International Business Center
Moscow International Business Center - Sputnik International
Subscribe
Russia has often been accused of engaging in so-called "hybrid warfare" following the outbreak of the Ukrainian civil war, but the term does not reflect Moscow's capabilities or activities; moreover, it "amounts to needless scaremongering in the West," Bloomberg View columnist Leonid Bershidsky asserted.

TV Man in the Autumn - Stencil - Sputnik International
World
US, NATO, EU 'Obsessed' With 'Highly Efficient Russian Propaganda'
The concept was initially applied to describe the tactics that Hezbollah fighters used against Israel during the 2016 Lebanon War. It later surfaced in 2013 when General Valery Gerasimov, chief of the Russian General Staff, mentioned non-military aspects as playing an increasing role in modern warfare. 

This, according to the Berlin-based writer, marked the moment when "the 'hybrid war' meme was born," although military theorists explored similar ideas centuries before the 2014 Maidan coup took place.

Moreover, Gerasimov's report was not meant to outline Russia's supposed new doctrine or the country's future approaches to conflicts. Instead his remarks, as Charles K. Bartles indicated, described "the primary threats to Russian sovereignty as stemming from US-funded social and political movements such as color revolutions, the Arab Spring, and the Maidan movement."

Kremlin, Moscow - Sputnik International
Not by Jets Alone: This is the Secret to Russia's Success in Syria
Nevertheless, the term has gained traction, turning into what Bershidsky described as a "catch-all for Russian hostility."

The United States and some of its allies have accused Russia of meddling in the Ukrainian conflict. Moscow has always denied these unfounded claims, making every effort to bring peace to the neighboring country. 

Most recently the term "hybrid warfare" has been applied to Russia's limited, but successful operation in Syria to describe military and non-military aspects of Moscow's engagement, including diplomacy and media campaign.

"I don't think grouping the Kremlin's actions in this way, or even calling them a strategy, is necessarily a mistake," Bershidsky observed. "But the use of the term amounts to needless scaremongering in the West and simply mirrors the paranoia that is often ascribed to Russia."

Newsfeed
0
To participate in the discussion
log in or register
loader
Chats
Заголовок открываемого материала