11:02 GMT +320 September 2019
Listen Live
    US Defense Secretary Ashton Carter

    Ash Carter: How to Scare Friends and Influence the Military Budget

    © AP Photo/ Susan Walsh
    Politics
    Get short URL
    13187
    Subscribe

    US Secretary of Defense Ashton Carter is fuming with 'righteous anger' over any attempt to cut the US defense budget: according to Carter, America is surrounded by enemies. However, the question remains open what is Ash Carter actually trying to defend – the US' national interests or the Pentagon's budget?

    Dr. Strangelove
    © Photo : Screenshot/Columbia Pictures/Stanley Kubrick
    In late March 2016 US Secretary of Defense Ashton Carter warned American lawmakers against any attempt to sequester the US defense budget at a hearing of the Senate Armed Services Committee on the fiscal year 2017 defense budget request.

    According to Carter, the US is facing numerous geopolitical challenges and defense budget cuts would put the country at an existential risk.

    DOD News reported that the 2017 defense budget request totals $582.7 billion — "$523.9 billion in the base budget and $58.8 billion in the overseas contingency operations fund."

    "Avoiding sequestration would prevent $100 billion in automatic cuts and allow the department to maintain stability and sustain critical investments," the news outlet wrote citing the US Secretary of Defense.

    It is no secret that the US spends significantly more on defense than any other country in the world.

    In fact, the latest Peter G. Peterson Foundation's study shows that Washington spends more on defense than China, Saudi Arabia, Russia, the United Kingdom, India, France and Japan combined.

    The Center on Budget and Policy Priorities, a nonpartisan research and policy institute, revealed in March 2016 that almost 16 percent of America's budget, or $602 billion, was paid for defense and security-related international activities in 2015. That included $74 billion spent on operations in Afghanistan and other related activities, described as Overseas Contingency Operations in the budget.

    Interestingly enough, the US defense budget has soared since 2001, when it amounted to $287 billion, to 2015 by almost $315 billion. It seems paradoxical: back in 2001 America's major geopolitical adversaries, the USSR and Warsaw Pact, were in ruins. Given this, it looks as if the number of external threats for Washington has increased not lessened with the collapse of the Soviet Union.

    The question then arises, what really is US Secretary of Defense Ash Carter defending, the country or the military budget?

    "Ash, who is characteristically no veteran and for whom war is an abstraction that must be supported by counting and piling up sufficient beans, thinks that more is always better when it comes to having fancy new toys to play with," notes Philip Giraldi, a former CIA Case Officer and Army Intelligence Officer who spent twenty years overseas in Europe and the Middle East working terrorism cases.

    "Ash justified all the needless spending by telling the Senators that there are five 'security challenges' confronting the United States — terrorism, North Korea, China, Russia and Iran — before lapsing into Pentagon-speak about why more money is always better than less money," Giraldi continues in his article for the Unz Review.

    However, although terrorism remains a transnational security issue it cannot do serious damage to the US, Giraldi notes, adding that in fact the United States would be less endangered by Daesh and al-Qaeda if the Pentagon and NATO had not destabilized the situation in the Middle East, North Africa and Central Asia, creating power vacuums in the region.

    North Korea also does not threaten the United States, "even in a worst case scenario," he notes.

    At the same time, "Ash favors a 'strong and balanced approach to deter Russian aggression' while also citing a China that is 'behaving aggressively.' And there is always Iran, which is demonstrating 'reckless and destabilizing behavior' manifesting as aggression, as well as 'malign' influence and threatening Washington's upholding its 'ironclad commitments' to Israel," Giraldi continues.

    According to the CIA veteran such an approach is ridiculous. What Carter depicted as an "aggressive" posture is in fact a reaction to Washington's assertive foreign policy.

    "In reality Russia reacted to American interference in Ukraine, China is involved in regional disputes that have been playing out since the end of the Vietnam War and a non-nuclear Iran is surrounded by enemies," Giraldi writes.

    "None of them threatens the US," he stresses.

    "Unfortunately, Ash Carter is not alone in his blustering," Giraldi remarks.

    Indeed, Joint Chiefs of Staff Chairman Marine General Joseph Dunford and NATO's top military commander General Philip Breedlove are also beating the war drums.

    Much in the same vein, the influential US RAND Corporation and its military-industrial sponsors continue to urge American lawmakers to increase military spending on NATO forces in Europe, citing the Russian phantom menace.

    In light of this Giraldi dubs the Department of Defense a "Department of War." "That is because what the United States actually does globally through its African, European, Pacific and Southern 'Commands' has little to do with what anyone would plausibly define as defense," he elaborates.

    Related:

    Why McCain's Military Surge Advice Plays Directly Into Daesh's Hands
    Riyadh's Blackmail: Is Washington Afraid of Saudi Threats to Dump Dollar?
    Marriage of Convenience: Does Washington Really Need Saudi Arabia as Ally?
    This is Why West Turns a Blind Eye to Saudis' Misdeeds in Yemen
    Tags:
    Middle East, defense budget, defense, war, NATO, Pentagon, Ashton Carter, Philip Breedlove, Joseph Dunford, USSR, Afghanistan, Iran, China, United States, Russia, North Africa, Central Asia
    Community standardsDiscussion
    Comment via FacebookComment via Sputnik