03:15 GMT +319 October 2019
Listen Live
    Vladimir Putin taking a trip on the newly launched Sapsan high-speed train linking Moscow and St. Petersburg, December 19, 2009.

    Blaming Putin for Russia's Troubled Relationship With US is 'Unreasonable'

    © Sputnik / Alexei Druzhinin
    Get short URL

    If Western political and military leadership took Russia's security interests and concerns into account, the cold spell between Moscow and the US would not have taken place, Norwegian historian and political scientist Bjorn Nistad asserted, adding that blaming Putin for what is referred to as the second instalment of the Cold War is "unreasonable."

    Nistad's reasoning is simple – in the early 2000s Putin reached out to the US. "Putin put a significant effort into improving [Russia's] relations with the United States and the West," the historian wrote in an article for Bergens Tidende, a Norwegian daily.

    Following the 9/11 attacks in the United States, the worst terrorist act in the American history, Russian President Vladimir Putin was the first to call his counterpart George W. Bush offering condolences and support. When Washington launched its campaign in Afghanistan, it was the Russian president who "convinced leaders of the former Soviet states in Asia to allow Americans to use their air bases," Nistad explained.

    The West could have chosen to deepen cordial relations with Russia, but it was apparently not inclined to cooperate with Moscow.

    Instead the United States launched its global missile defense initiative, much to Russia's discontent. The North Atlantic Alliance welcomed new members, expanding closer towards Russia's western borders – a move that Moscow was very uncomfortable with. In addition, the West supported the so-called color revolutions in post-Soviet states. In all these instances Russia's opinion and concerns were dismissed as unimportant.

    "The 2008 war with Georgia, which was sparked by Tbilisi attacking South Ossetia, proved that the Russian leadership was ready to use force to protect what it considered to be its vitally important geopolitical interests," Nistad observed. "Western politicians should have understood that it was stupid to provoke Russia, since Moscow had the means and the will to answer in kind."

    Yet apparently nobody was willing to learn the lesson as evidenced by the 2014 foreign-sponsored coup in Ukraine. Russian authorities viewed what happened in the neighboring country as "unacceptable," the historian noted, adding that any Russian leader would have been "forced to react."

    It is this logic, Nistad believes, that points to an inescapable conclusion – Ukraine should never become a NATO member. "Provocations like the one that led to the downing of a Russian military plane should also be avoided," he added, referring to Turkey shooting down a Russian Su-24 in November 2015.


    Strange Bedfellows in Syria: What Washington Prefers Not to Speak Of
    How NATO is Sowing Seeds of Perpetual Chaos in Middle East, North Africa
    US Should Take Russia’s Commitment to Backing Ceasefire in Syria Seriously
    US Shouldn't Ignore Russia’s Vested Interest in Syrian Ports - Lawmaker
    politics, NATO expansion, NATO, Vladimir Putin, United States, Russia
    Community standardsDiscussion
    Comment via FacebookComment via Sputnik