09:32 GMT +322 October 2019
Listen Live
    Syrian men walk past a poster bearing a portrait of President Bashar al-Assad in the capital Damascus, on February 27, 2016, as the first major ceasefire of the five-year war takes hold and an international task force prepares to begin monitoring the landmark truce

    The Door to Peace: Why Even Fragile Syrian Ceasefire Matters

    © AFP 2019 / LOUAI BESHARA
    Politics
    Get short URL
    4233
    Subscribe

    Although some "armchair strategists" are eager to continue the war in Syria to the last fighter, it is far more important to turn the fragile truce into something a little less fragile, CIA veteran Paul R. Pillar notes.

    Regardless of skepticism triggered by the Syrian ceasefire among the US politicians and Pentagon warhawks, the "cessation of hostilities" may open the doors to peace, or at least a frozen conflict, in Syria.

    Of course, some grounds for pessimism are valid. The situation is complicated by the fact that the truce does not include Daesh and the al-Qaeda affiliated al-Nusra. But even a partial ceasefire matters a great deal.

    ​"An important objective in the weeks ahead will be not to let the perfect be the enemy of the good. The fact that a partial cease-fire has taken hold at all indicates that there is something to build upon," Paul R. Pillar, CIA veteran and nonresident senior fellow at the Brookings Institution, notes in his article for the National Interest.

    According to the CIA veteran, to aid the peace process Washington and other members of "the international Syria support group" should get rid of a "couple of persistent mindsets."

    "One is the dogma that Assad must go… The other mindset to shed is the notion that any initiative, action, or grabbing of the spotlight in this arena by Vladimir Putin and the Russians is ipso facto a setback for US interests," Pillar underscores.

    Pillar envisions that "the best feasible outcomes for Syria in the foreseeable future" — along with expelling al-Qaeda and Daesh from the region — would be a "frozen conflict."

    "Frozen conflicts are unsatisfying and offensive to the principles of national unity and territorial integrity, but they sometimes are better than the available alternatives," he stresses.

    "They can lead to enough long-term stability to get a conflict out of the headlines and off policy-makers' front burner," the CIA veteran emphasizes.

    Commenting on the matter, The Saker, a pseudonym for the US-based senior European military analyst, told Sputnik that the Syrian ceasefire will not turn into a Donbass-style stalemate, a frozen conflict between ultra-nationalists in Kiev and pro-Russian independence supporters in eastern Ukraine. The conflict is far from being settled in Ukraine since Kiev has repeatedly violated the Minsk II accords.

    "It [the Syrian ceasefire] won't be a solid deal like the US-Russian deal on Syrian chemical weapons [in 2013], but it will not be a Donbass-style stalemate either simply because the agreement and the UNSC Resolution specifically call for the complete elimination/destruction of the various terrorist organizations in Syria," The Saker noted.

    A Syrian national flag waves as vehicles move slowly on a bridge during rush hour, in Damascus, Syria, Sunday, Feb. 28, 2016
    © AP Photo / Hassan Ammar
    A Syrian national flag waves as vehicles move slowly on a bridge during rush hour, in Damascus, Syria, Sunday, Feb. 28, 2016

    Many experts agree that Damascus can settle the conflict by maintaining the territorial integrity of Syria.

    Syria can avoid dissolution "by insisting on the respect of all relevant Security Council Resolutions which have specifically called for a unitary secular Syria," The Saker told Sputnik in an exclusive interview.

    The military analyst stressed that the Syrian ceasefire is a huge diplomatic victory for Russia and its allies.

    By highlighting the significance of the truce Pillar in some sense echoes The Saker.

    "The main underlying principle in addressing the Syrian problem and trying to nurse a fragile truce into being something a little less fragile is that it is the war itself, far more than any particular internal political outcome or distribution of power, that has made Syria a problem for international security, with threats of spreading regional instability and far-flung violent extremism," the CIA veteran underscores.

    Related:

    Syrian Ceasefire Mostly Holding - French Foreign Ministry
    Assad Says Western Embargo Provokes Humanitarian Crisis in Syria
    NATO Watching Russian Actions in Syria to Determine Validity of Ceasefire
    Saudis Are 'Desperate': Syrian War Does Not Go According to Riyadh's Plan
    Tags:
    Syrian ceasefire, truce, Minsk agreement, The Syrian war, Daesh, Al-Nusra Front, al-Qaeda, Pentagon, Syria, United States, Ukraine
    Community standardsDiscussion
    Comment via FacebookComment via Sputnik