15:22 GMT02 December 2020
Listen Live
    Get short URL

    Washington's anti-ISIL campaign is not working for two major reasons: there is no such thing as moderate rebels and some members of the US coalition are essentially "exporting jihad" by supporting radical groups the US is intent on tackling, Dr. Christina Lin wrote for Asia Times.

    US officials still maintain that some rebels do not adhere to radical ideology and are in fact quite moderate in their views, although there is no evidence to support this assertion. 

    "Distracted by an alphabet soup of various Salafist jihadi groups … and trying to separate 'good terrorists' from 'bad terrorists,' Washington is blindsided by the fact that ultimately they share the same end of establishing a global caliphate under Sharia, only differing in the means and speed of that goal," the former director for China policy at the US Department of Defense noted.

    Washington's strategy is also complicated by the fact that several members of the counterterrorism coalition once helped the self-styled Islamic State gain strength and are still tacitly supporting other radical groups in the Middle Easy, she added.

    After a year of the US-led efforts, "the Islamic caliphate is getting stronger and on the march, destroying the old world order and establishing a new one with the implicit backing of Saudi Arabia, Qatar, and especially Turkey's Erdogan," she observed. Essentially, some US allies are apparently "exporting jihad."

    Interesting fact: those rebels fighting in Syria, who receive aid from Riyadh, Doha and Ankara, are not Syrians. Some 95 percent of them are mercenaries, Lin said, citing data released by German intelligence agency, BND.

    Russia, China and India see the rise of ISIL as a direct challenge to their security. This prompted Moscow to launch an aerial campaign to tackle Islamic radicals in Syria. The main goal is to prevent them from spreading to Eurasia.

    Tackling ISIL is therefore a priority for these countries but it should also be the key objective of the US policy in the Middle East. Assad is not the problem, radical Islam is.

    "Given combating IS is the unifier of great powers while Syrian regime change is the divider that allows IS to get stronger, US should recalibrate its Sunni Wahhabi-driven strategy and start working with other legitimate Mideast stakeholders to counter Islamic extremism. Absent this, it may behoove the Eurasian powers outside of US-led coalition to take Kissinger's advice, and begin forging their own coalition via SCO and CSTO to counter terrorism in Syria," Lin concluded.


    Russian Warplanes Use Bunker Buster Bombs in Airstrikes in Syria
    Shrewd Diplomacy: Putin 'Forges Alliances With Every Key Player' in Mideast
    Syrian Ground Campaign: Pentagon Pushing Americans Toward Another Vietnam
    Does the US Sending Troops to Syria Amount to Illegal 'Aggression'?
    Daesh, counterterrorism, Syrian conflict, Islamic extremism, radical Islam, Turkey, Qatar, Saudi Arabia, Syria, US, Russia
    Community standardsDiscussion