06:12 GMT +314 October 2019
Listen Live
    US President Barack Obama speaks during a surprise visit with US troops at Bagram Air Field, north of Kabul, in Afghanistan, May 25, 2014, prior to the Memorial Day holiday

    US Neocons Ready to Risk Lives of American Soldiers in Syria – Ron Paul

    © AFP 2019 / Saul LOEB
    Politics
    Get short URL
    15529
    Subscribe

    Americans must speak out now before it's too late, Ron Paul warns, pointing to the fact that US neocons obsessed about their regime change idea have no scruples about risking the lives of US soldiers and even a major war in the region.

    Although Defense Secretary Ashton Carter admitted the complete failure of the US "train and equip" program for rebels in Syria, he is not going to give up, former US congressman Ron Paul remarks.

    "Instead of taking the appropriate lessons from that failure and getting out of the 'regime change' business, he announced the opposite. The US would not only escalate its 'train and equip' program by removing the requirement that fighters be vetted for extremist ideology, but according to the Secretary the US military would for the first time become directly and overtly involved in combat in Syria and Iraq," Dr. Paul emphasized in his article for the Institute of Peace and Prosperity.

    To complicate matters further, Secretary Carter proclaimed that the US would begin to fight Islamic State directly "whether by strikes from the air or direct action on the ground."

    "Direct action on the ground" means US boots on the ground, the former congressman stressed.

    President Obama ruled out such a possibility when he launched an anti-ISIL military campaign in Iraq and Syria last year, but it is likely the White House will break the promise now.

    "Did anyone think he would keep his word?" Dr. Paul asked rhetorically.

    The former American congressmen pointed out that Obama claims that "his current authority to conduct war in Iraq and Syria comes from the 2001 authorization for the use of force against those who attacked the US on 9/11, or from the 2002 authorization for the use of force against Saddam Hussein."  

    But the 2002 authorization was not about Islamic State, because there was no ISIL at that time; similarly, the 2001 authorization was aimed against al-Qaeda, which did not exist in Iraq or Syria at the time.

    Thus far, judicially speaking, neither of these claims makes any sense today, not to mention the fact that Obama's year-long bombing campaign in Syria is a violation of the country's sovereignty and is illegal according to international law, Ron Paul pointed out.

    Needless to say, Congress is not even consulted while the US President is preparing for another overseas military campaign.

    "I cannot condemn in strong enough terms this ill-advised US military escalation in the Middle East. Whoever concluded that it is a good idea to send US troops into an area already being bombed by Russian military forces should really be relieved of duty," Ron Paul underscored.

    Dr. Paul called attention to the fact that US interventionism has already resulted in the damage and devastation in Iraq, Syria and Libya. Now US neocons are determined to risk the lives of US troops and even risk a major war in the region, he warned.

    "This is not our war. It is time for the American people to rise up and demand that the Obama Administration bring our military home from this increasingly dangerous no-win confrontation. We must speak out now, before it is too late!" Dr. Paul concluded.

    Related:

    Energy War Game: Syrian Turmoil, Ukrainian Coup Two Sides of the Same Coin
    Apple of Discord: Golan Heights Oil to Add Fuel to the Fire of Syrian War
    It's All About Gas? US Hawks Plan to Transform Syria Into 'Another Libya'
    Noam Chomsky: 2003 'Invasion of Iraq is the Worst Crime' of 21st Century
    Tags:
    Daesh, neocons, risk, interventionism, conflict, war, troops, The Syrian war, 9/11, US Congress, al-Qaeda, Pentagon, Ashton Carter, Ron Paul, Barack Obama, Libya, Syria, Iraq, United States, Russia
    Community standardsDiscussion
    Comment via FacebookComment via Sputnik