SU-30SM, SU-35S, and SU-34 flying in formation - Sputnik International
Military
Get the latest defense news from around the world: breaking stories, photos, videos, in-depth analysis and much more...

US Lacks Will, Strategy to Win Wars It Started

© Flickr / Glenn PopeWhite House
White House - Sputnik International
Subscribe
Washington has spent billions on military campaigns in the Middle East. However, both the US and its allies cannot bring the chaos and instability in the region to an end.

Rally to support Bashar al-Assad and Vladimir Putin in Latakia, file photo - Sputnik International
Obama’s Weakness Paves Way for Russia to Leadership in Middle East
In recent years, the US has put major efforts and enormous sums of money to boost security in such troubled countries as Afghanistan and Iraq.

What is more, US forces have killed thousands of militants, including Taliban leader Mohammed Omar, al-Qaeda mastermind Osama bin-Laden or numerous ISIL commanders.

However, the US military continues to sustain major strategic losses in the region, journalist Mark Thompson wrote in his article for Time magazine.

In June 2014, ISIL fighters seized Mosul, Iraq’s second-largest city. Last May, they did much the same in Ramadi, the capital of Iraqi province of Anbar. This week, the Taliban captured the Afghan city of Kunduz, the first time the militants have taken a provincial capital since 2001.

Why cities governed by US allies continue to fall into enemy hands, the author wonders.

A general view shot taken on June 30, 2015, shows a neighbourhood in the Syrian capital Damascus - Sputnik International
Russian Involvement Will Shift Balance of Forces in Middle East - Expert
There are two main building components of war – weapons and will, he wrote.

According to the author, despite the fact that the US spent billions on arming and training friendly forces, they lack will to fight, and no arsenal can save the situation in the long-term perspective.

"But that lack of will doesn’t apply only to U.S. allies. Much of the responsibility must be borne by the US itself," Thompson pointed out in the article published in Time magazine.

"Beyond cheering from the sidelines, the American public has been AWOL in the nation’s post-9/11 conflicts. […] Congress has refused to declare war on any nation the US has attacked. Requiring a declaration of war … would push the nation toward fully resourcing a conflict. That would raise the bar, resulting in fewer wars with better outcomes," he explained.

The military also bears responsibility, the author wrote. Back in 2001, the military knew that it was impossible to rebuild Afghanistan without eradicating terrorist groups over the border in Pakistan. Despite this serious strategic flaw, the military campaign in Afghanistan dragged on.

"Such efforts only make the US look feckless, when the original rosy projections bear little resemblance to what’s left behind. The resulting wreckage has generated opportunities in the region for Iran and Russia to exploit. The notion that the US military can bring order to chaos rooted in centuries of religious intolerance is absurd," according to the article.

Newsfeed
0
To participate in the discussion
log in or register
loader
Chats
Заголовок открываемого материала