17:30 GMT +321 January 2020
Listen Live
    Politics
    Get short URL
    0 123
    Subscribe

    It seems that the abyss between Washington and the Middle Eastern Arab monarchies is growing deeper, Michael Crowley noted, adding that the forthcoming summit at Camp David later this week will be no walk in the park.

    Arab regimes have been infuriated by Obama's recent remark that they should worry more about their repressive domestic policies, than the threat from Tehran, Michael Crowley, an American expert in foreign affairs and national security, pointed out.

    "I think the biggest threats that they face may not be coming from Iran invading. It's going to be from dissatisfaction inside their own countries. That's a tough conversation to have, but it's one that we have to have," Barack Obama said last month as quoted by the expert.

    In this picture taken on Tuesday, April 7, 2015, and released by the semi-official Fars News Agency, Iranian warship Alborz, foreground, prepares before leaving Iran's waters, at the Strait of Hormuz
    © AP Photo / Fars News Agency, Mahdi Marizad
    Michael Crowley pointed out that that both Saudi Arabia and the United Arab Emirates (UAE) passed severe counterterrorism laws, cracking down hard on their political and religious opponents.

    For instance, in March 2015, Saudi authorities sentenced a blogger, Raif Badawi, to 1,000 lashes and ten years in prison. At the same time Bahrain has been widely denounced for its "unchecked repressions," since its Sunni-led regime brutally suppressed a Shiite uprising in 2011.

    Although political reforms are not on the official agenda at the Camp David talks between Barack Obama and the Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC) representatives, there is certain tension in the air, the expert noted.

    "That tension — along with increasingly low expectations for security guarantees that might emerge from the summit — could explain the low attendance expected from the kings, emirs and sultans of the GCC states," he underscored.

    Furthermore, Obama's nuclear talks with Iran have only added fuel to the fire, as Arab Sunni governments consider Tehran a "mortal enemy." It's hardly surprising that they are seriously irritated with Obama's remarks about the greatness of "Persian civilization."

    "The chaos in the Middle East has put Obama in an awkward position when it comes to the Arab world's authoritarian regimes. Obama believes they need to reform dramatically or face popular upheavals that could topple their regimes and turn their countries into the next Syria or Libya," the expert pointed out.

    However, the Arab monarchies have repeatedly signaled that they could carry out reforms "only incrementally," in order to prevent political turmoil. They warned Washington that "pure democracy" may lead to strong anti-American sentiment in the oil-rich region.

    They have also expressed their dissatisfaction with Washington's public criticism of their domestic policies, denouncing it as counterproductive.

    "We still don't share your democratic values — but we are great partners," said UAE ambassador to Washington Yousef Al Otaiba at a May 6 Atlantic Council forum, as quoted by Michael Crowley.

    Still, it is evident that not everything is coming up roses for Washington and its longstanding allies in the Middle East.

    Related:

    Saudi Arabia Reportedly Concentrates Troops, Armor on Yemen Border
    Former Yemeni President Saleh Declares Alliance With Houthi Rebels
    New Alliance: Iran, UAE Become Members of Chinese Development Bank
    The Erdogan-Salman Pact Over Syria Creates Un-Islamic State 2.0
    Tags:
    Middle East, Daesh, human rights abuse, democracy, radical Islamist, political reform, Arab Spring, Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC), Tehran, Iran, Washington, Libya, Syria, United States, United Arab Emirates, Saudi Arabia
    Community standardsDiscussion
    Comment via FacebookComment via Sputnik