18:19 GMT +314 October 2019
Listen Live
    Northrop Grumman B-2 Spirit AV-2, Spirit of Arizona - 82-1067

    Change the Jet, Change the Game: Future Wars to Focus on Long-Range Bombers

    © Flickr/ Christopher Ebdon
    Get short URL
    0 414

    A recent study conducted by the Center for Strategic and Budgetary Assessment (CSBA) concluded that US warplanes in the future will look more like stealthy, long-range bombers than small, high-speed, air-to-air combat planes.

    The study was carried out by John Stillion, a former US Air Force officer and a fellow at the CBSA. According to the report, which was obtained by Breaking Defense, the research analyzed "over 1,450 air-to-air victories" all over the world since 1960.

    Based on this analysis, Stillion concluded that "over the past few decades, advancements in electronic sensors, communication technology, and guided weapons may have fundamentally transformed the nature of air combat."

    What this means, according to Stallion, is that the US Air Force will gradually see a decline in aircrafts that use speed and maneuverability to seek and kill enemy planes. The report predicts that these "traditional" fighters will be replaced by multi-role, stealthy, long-range aircrafts the same size as bombers.

    Stillion reached this conclusion by analyzing trends in the last fifty years. The report notes that in the first Gulf War in 1991, only four out of a total of 33 US kills involved any maneuvering from fighter aircrafts. Almost 25 years later, these planes have become even less important than they used to be.

    "Aircraft performance attributes essential for success in air-to-air combat during the gun and early missile eras such as high speed, good acceleration, and maneuverability," Stillion writes, "are much less useful now that aircraft can be detected and engaged from dozens of miles away."

    F-18E Super Hornet
    © REUTERS / US Air Force, Shawn Nickel, File

    He additionally stressed that faster aircrafts can become more of a liability, as higher speeds mean a more heated engine, which in turn, can be easily detected by Search and Track Systems that are increasingly being used by enemy combatants to locate and target such aircrafts.

    In this light, Stillion says that in the future, the Pentagon should consider "'radical'" departures from traditional fighter concepts that rely on enhanced sensor performance, signature control, networks to achieve superior SA [situational awareness], and very-long-range weapons to complete engagements before being detected or tracked by enemy aircraft."

    After an exercise in the Gulf of Mexico, the US Air Force said that an armed Reaper drone demonstrated that it can hit maritime targets in coordination with other aircrafts, including A-10 Thunderbolt IIs, F-16 Fighting Falcons and F-35A Lightning IIs.
    © AP Photo / Leslie Pratt, US Air Force

    Speaking to Breaking Defense, an industry insider said that while Stillion may not be far off with his conclusion, the US Air Force is unlikely to depart from its use of traditional fighters anytime soon. "How will the US Air Force leadership – primarily composed of fighter pilots – react to the idea of using 'bombers' to do the air superiority mission?"

    The industry source, however, also said that he could envision a future US Air Force fleet of 400 bomber-sized multi-role aircrafts constituting the core of the US military’s air power.


    Pentagon Wants Canada to Install Upgraded Missile Sensors in Arctic
    Pentagon Launches Submarine-Tracking Unmanned 'Ghost Ships' This Fall
    Pentagon Chief Mulls Loosening Enlistment Standards
    Fighter jet, Stealth bomber, bomber, US Air Force, Pentagon, John Stillion, United States
    Community standardsDiscussion
    Comment via FacebookComment via Sputnik