06:13 GMT21 October 2020
Listen Live
    Military & Intelligence
    Get short URL
    by
    4224
    Subscribe

    According to the latest report on inspections of US Navy surface warships, the aging fleet’s propulsion, electrical and Aegis combat systems are all showing their age. The sobering report comes after changes in the inspection process which make the examinations more rigorous and less predictable than before.

    The US Navy’s surface combatants are scoring more and more poorly on reports by the Navy’s Board of Inspection and Survey (INSURV), a body created by Congress to ensure fleet readiness. According to Defense News, INSURV’s most recent annual report marked significant drops in the readiness of key systems on many warships.

    Propulsion systems and electrical systems were the two categories in which scores slipped the most, with each dropping 20% on more than 30 surface ships over the last five years, according to the report. Submarine propulsion systems saw a smaller 9% decline in scores over the last five years.

    Other systems that have been in decline include the Aegis combat system, which governs the defensive and offensive missile systems of the Navy’s guided missile cruisers and destroyers and scores of which slipped by 9%, and aviation systems for surface combatants, down by 12%.

    However, according to the Navy, the lower scores are a result of a more honest assessment of the fleet’s readiness. Last year, changes to the inspection regimen made them both more rigorous and less predictable, eliminating the possibility of requesting a deferment of the inspection. Cmdr. Nicole Schwegman, a spokesperson for Naval Surface Forces, said ships would request parts from other ships in order to score higher on INSURV inspections.

    “Because ships knew exactly when the inspection would occur, they were able to put their best foot forward during the exam,” Schwegman told Defense News. “As a result, Navy leadership directed that future INSURV inspections be performed at any time during a ship’s [deployment cycle], and with minimal notice … The inspection is therefore more ‘come as you are’ than it has been in the past.”

    In March, the Navy said it planned to cancel service life-extending upgrades to the first 27 Arleigh Burke-class destroyers built nearly 30 years ago, even as it sets lofty goals for expanding the size of the fleet in coming years. Sputnik has also reported that the Navy’s shipbuilding budget and schedule remain inadequate to meet the service’s stated goal of a 355-ship fleet by 2030.

    Related:

    US Navy Announces Multi-Year ‘Recovery Plan’ as Embattled Fleet Short Nearly 100 Fighter Pilots
    Already Challenged by Fleet Size Goals, Pentagon Expected to Ask for 530-Ship Navy
    US Navy Establishes First Training Squadron for Stingray Tanker Drones It Doesn’t Have
    Tags:
    electricals, propulsion system, warships, surface, inspection, US Navy
    Community standardsDiscussion