16:17 GMT18 April 2021
Listen Live
    Military & Intelligence
    Get short URL

    MOSCOW (Sputnik) - Kremlin believes that Turkey's possible purchase of US Patriot Missile System and of Russian S-400 Triumph air defense systems are not connected, and that Russia-Turkey contract on S-400 purchase will be continued, Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Peskov said on Wednesday.

    "These processes are not connected. In this case, we are implementing the agreements that we already have reached with our Turkish colleagues. You know that the project and the contract related to S-400 is being implemented, and it will be continued," Peskov told reporters.

    READ MORE: National Currencies to Be Used in Russia-Turkey Settlements on S-400 Deliveries

    The Russian-Turkish contract on S-400 purchase envisages Ankara's non-disclosure of certain data, and Moscow trusts its Turkish partners, Peskov added.

    "As a rule, Russian defense military and defense cooperation with other states necessarily envisages legal obligations on non-disclosure of certain categories of information, of sensitive data related to this cooperation. In case with the Turkish side, there are such obligations as well… We see no reason not to trust our Turkish partners," Peskov said.

    In December 2017, Ankara signed a loan agreement with Moscow envisaging the delivery of the Russian-made S-400 air defence systems to Turkey.

    S-400 Triumph (NATO reporting name SA-21 Growler) is Russia's most advanced surface-to-air missile system. It has a range of 400 kilometres (248 miles) and is capable of tracking and destroying all existing aerial targets, including ballistic and cruise missiles.


    Fourth S-400 Battalion Deployed Near Ukraine to Protect Crimea – Black Sea Fleet
    Russia Puts One More S-400 Battalion Into Service in Crimea Amid Kerch Row
    Coupled With S-300 and S-400, Su-57s Sent Clear Message to US, Israel – Analysts
    Growing Demand for Russia's S-400 is 'Message' to US - German Media
    S-400, Dmitry Peskov, Turkey, Russia
    Community standardsDiscussion