21:53 GMT +315 November 2018
Listen Live
    The Northern Sea Route: An Arctic lifeline

    US Navy Confirms Arctic at Low Conflict Risk - Report

    © RIA Novosti . A. Solomonov
    Military & Intelligence
    Get short URL
    103

    WASHINGTON (Sputnik) - The Arctic Ocean region remains at low risk for international conflict, but the US Navy has sufficient forces deployed to carry out the national strategy for the region announced in 2016, the Government Accountability Office (GAO) said in a report on Thursday.

    "The Navy's June 2018 report aligns with Department of Defense (DOD) assessments that the Arctic is at low risk for conflict and that DOD has the capabilities to execute the 2016 DOD Arctic Strategy," the report said.

    The June 2018 report also aligns with assessments of Arctic capabilities and gaps in the Navy's 2014 road map for implementing the strategy, the GAO noted.

    "The report notes the significant limitations for operating surface ships in the Arctic, but states that the Navy has the capabilities required for executing the strategy, and so has no plan to design ice-hardened surface ships," the GAO said.

    Defense Department officials stated that the United States has options other than Navy surface ships for demonstrating the US right to operate in the Arctic, including using Coast Guard vessels, Navy submarines or military aircraft, the report added.

    READ MORE: US Sends Carrier Strike Group Above Arctic Circle for First Time in 30 Years

    Related:

    Denmark, US Uneasy as China Eyes Greenlandic Oil as Part of Major Arctic Push
    Russian Strategic Bombers Stay Airborne for Some 10 Hours Over Arctic Seas
    Canada Eyes UK Frigate Purchase to Counter Russia in Arctic – Report
    Courting Disaster: Why Are the Dutch Boosting NATO Cooperation in the Arctic?
    US Sends Carrier Strike Group Above Arctic Circle for First Time in 30 Years
    Tags:
    military, risk, conflict, US Department of Defense (DoD), US Government Accountability Office (GAO), US Navy, Arctic
    Community standardsDiscussion
    Comment via FacebookComment via Sputnik