02:47 GMT +313 November 2019
Listen Live
    Challenger 2 tank

    Dangerous Business: BAE Systems Tank Failure Claimed Lives of British Corporals

    © Photo: Facebook/BritishArmyPhotographers
    Military & Intelligence
    Get short URL
    3144
    Subscribe

    On June 14 2017, British Royal Tank Regiment Corporals Matthew Hatfield and Darren Neilson were killed after an explosion and fire on their tank at a military live-firing range in Wales. A coroner has now ruled the incident occurred due to an undetected design flaw on the armored vehicle’s gun barrel.

    The pair's fatal injuries were incurred during a live-firing exercise on Castlemartin Ranges, south-west Wales, designed to provide a "guest shoot" to Warrant Officer Stuart Lawson, who worked at the site. He was given the opportunity to experience being in a tank, and firing its main gun at three old tanks, nicknamed Tom, Dick and Harry.

    Louise Hunt, senior coroner for Birmingham and Solihull, said the "main cause" was the tank's gun could be fired despite its bolt vent axial — a crucial component that blocks hot gases escaping into the crew turret — being missing.

    Ukraine test US-made Javlin Anti-Tank missiles for first time after the US State Department approved the sale in March 2018.
    Ukraine test US-made Javlin Anti-Tank missiles for first time after the US State Department approved the sale in March 2018.
    Corporal Neilson, 31, a father-of-one from Preston, Lancashire, was the tank commander — he was thrown from the turret during the blast. Corporal Hatfield, 27, also a father from Amesbury, Wiltshire, was loading ammunition. Both were veterans of Iraq and Afghanistan. Lawson and Trooper Michael Warren were also injured — with the former suffering burns, and losing fingers and an ear — but survived.

    Catastrophic Failures

    A set of recommendations has been sent to the Ministry of Defense and BAE Systems, which designed and manufactured the tank, the Challenger 2. However, the coroner also identified a series of critical internal errors that significantly contributed to the disaster. For example, it emerged the men's commanding officer, Lieutenant Colonel Simon Ridgway, was not made aware the guest shoot was happening that day and hadn't passed down an order for Lawson to "sit on his hands" — ie leave firing to the tank's commander. He also didn't seek authorization from a superior before allowing it to go ahead.

    Challenger 2 tank live firing during exercise
    Challenger 2 tank live firing during exercise

    Moreover, the inquest heard crews shared tanks, known as ‘hot-bedding' — and a whiteboard on the barracks — used to assign crews and activities to tanks — was not updated promptly.

    The inquest was also told by an Royal Tank Regiment armorer tank charges were routinely kept out of ‘safe bins' and sometimes even balanced on crew members' laps on armored vehicles, in order to allow them quick and easy access.

    Testifying, Ridgway said he hadn't spotted the culture of charges being wrongly stored, but claimed while he "failed to identify it was happening", he wasn't sure this constituted a "failure of leadership".

    Nonetheless, he conceded he "felt physically sick" when he heard troops were stowing charges outside bins.

    Recurring Theme

    The coroner's ruling is not the first time a combination of faulty equipment and lackadaisical internal approaches to safety have proven fatal for the British armed forces. In 2008, an inquest ruled 10 Royal Air Force were unlawfully killed when their Hercules aircraft was shot down in Iraq in 2005, with investigators concluding "serious systemic failures" had deprived victims of the "opportunity for survival".

    The failure of the MoD and RAF to fit Hercules planes with explosion-suppressant foam (ESF) was found to constitute a "serious failure" — and the lives of the men aboard 47 Squadron Special Forces flight XV179 could've been saved had their aircraft been equipped with the safety provision — coroner David Masters ruled.

    Lockheed Martin's C-130J-SOF Super Hercules
    © Photo : Lockheed Martin
    Lockheed Martin's C-130J-SOF Super Hercules
    American Hercules aircraft having been fitted with ESF since the 1960s, but the RAF ignored repeated pleas to fit British Hercules planes accordingly. Adding insult to injury, the inquest was alleged to have been stonewalled by both MoD and US military officials, with Masters claiming the investigation had been "plagued by an inability to retrieve documents" relating to RAF decisions prior to the tragedy.

    Despite this conspiracy of silence, uncovered files did reveal a 2002 military research document strongly advised Hercules planes be fitted with ESF, a recommendation reiterated in a 2003 Tactical Analysis Team report. Moreover, it was clear Hercules crews weren't apprised of the danger they were in, information that might have motivated them to alter their flying tactics.

    However, in ‘friendly fire' fatality terms, 2018 has been a particularly gruesome year for the British military. In March, an RAF engineer was killed when a Red Arrows jet crashed shortly after take-off at RAF Valley in north Wales. It was the third Red Arrows fatality in seven years following two in 2011. All three have involved the Hawk T1, an archaic model not due to be replaced before 2030.

    The pilot survived the crash by ejecting seconds before the Hawk aircraft hit the ground at the base, bursting into a ball of flames, while the engineer was not so lucky — perhaps precipitously, the month prior ejector seat manufacturer Martin-Baker Aircraft Company was fined over US$1.5 million after a breach of health and safety law led to the death of Red Arrows pilot Flight Lieutenant Sean Cunningham.

    Britain's Defence Secretary Gavin Williamson poses alongside a replica British Royal Air Force's (RAF) Red Arrows BAE Hawk aircraft outside numbers 10 and 11 Downing Street in central London on May 23, 2018, as part of the RAF's 2018 centenary celebrations
    © AFP 2019 / Daniel LEAL-OLIVAS
    Britain's Defence Secretary Gavin Williamson poses alongside a replica British Royal Air Force's (RAF) Red Arrows BAE Hawk aircraft outside numbers 10 and 11 Downing Street in central London on May 23, 2018, as part of the RAF's 2018 centenary celebrations
    At the start of July, army Captain Jonathan Price was found guilty of the death of Ranger Michael Maguire at Castlemartin training area, the very site of June 2017's tank tragedy, while his subordinates Lieutenant Colonel Richard Bell and Warrant Officer Stuart Pankhurst were found guilty of negligently performing a duty.

    Maguire, 21, was serving with the 1st Battalion, Royal Irish Regiment when he was hit in the head by a stray bullet during a live-fire exercise in 2012. He died instantly. Soldiers on one part of the 10 were firing directly at those in another part of the range, about one kilometer away — where they would've been visible. Despite this, Price failed to enact proper safety measures to ensure one group's fire did not risk the other — as a result, several participants came under live fire. After Maguire died, a witness alleged Price said to him "I've messed up haven't I?".

    "All three men played their part in causing this catastrophe in different ways. The common sense of the situation is you do not point guns at people, you do not design, permit or allow an activity that allows machine guns to fire directly in line with your men, men that you know are there, men that you might be able to see, if not the vehicles with them," said prosecuting QC Nigel Lickley at the trio's trial.

    Price was accused by Lickley of failing to conducted a ‘recce' of the range when preparing a Range Action Safety Plan, placing targets too close together and failing to "deconflict" the two exercises.

     

    Related:

    Time for a Career Change? Defense Giant BAE Systems Cuts 2,000 UK Jobs
    'Fight, Survive and Win': British Army Moves Closer to Tank Modernization
    'Dark Time': Female RAF Recruit Subjected to Sexualized Abuse at UK Base
    Weather Weapons, Inside Jobs, Coverups: The Secret History of Britain's RAF
    Tags:
    military failure, tanks, military equipment, equipment failures, British Armed Forces, Britain's Royal Air Force, United Kingdom
    Community standardsDiscussion
    Comment via FacebookComment via Sputnik