05:09 GMT +321 October 2019
Listen Live
    North Korea

    Military Confrontation With N Korea May Backfire on US Despite All Advantages

    © AP Photo/ Wong Maye-E, File
    Military & Intelligence
    Get short URL
    Hot Button Issue: Latest Launches, Nuclear Tests Escalate Korean Crisis (97)

    The United States is far ahead of North Korea in terms of resources and capabilities, but a direct military confrontation with Pyongyang may still backfire, experts told Sputnik.

    MOSCOW (Sputnik) — On Sunday, US Ambassador to the United Nations Nikki Haley said that the UN Security Council had exhausted its options for getting North Korea to halt missile and nuclear program, adding that she would be "perfectly happy" handing the crisis over to the Pentagon, which had plenty of potential military solutions.


    Ba Dianjun, the head of the Institute of International Politics at the College of Northeast Asian Studies at Jilin University, said that the United States would have to carefully weigh the potential advantages and disadvantages of the military solution to the crisis on the Korean Peninsula since Pyongyang has nuclear weapons technology.

    "Although these technologies can hardly be compared to the US ones, still, from the point of view of defense, the United States should consider potential harm," Ba said.

    According to the expert, the United States is not completely impervious to Pyongyang’s potential response, even though it does have an overwhelming advantage.

    Andrei Lankov, a professor at the Kookmin University in Seoul, also pointed out that North Korea would be capable of inflicting considerable damage even if it did not use nuclear weapons.

    "If the United States carries out precision strikes at military targets, destroying missiles as they are being prepared for test launches, perhaps, such activities will not lead to a full-blown conflict, but they will not have any serious consequences for North Korean missile and nuclear program either. On the contrary, North Korea will get an important experience of launches in a combat-like situation," Lankov said.


    US top officials floated the idea of resorting to military options in the wake of Pyongyang’s latest nuclear test, held earlier in September. However, several states, including Russia and China, have urged caution and restraint in solving the crisis.

    Ba said that he could not completely rule out Washington acting unilaterally and thus circumventing the UNSC resolution, but that was unlikely.

    "If the United States acts, it will have to consider how this will impact on other large states. This concerns, in particular, China and Russia, which are permanent members of the UNSC and have their own special interests on the Korean Peninsula," the expert said.

    According to Ba, the United States needed the UNSC to "pass the burden of the Korean issue on to China and Russia."

    The expert added that the latest statement by Haley did not contain anything that had not been said before and served to re-apply pressure on all involved parties.


    North Korea’s Foreign Ministry responded to the news of UNSC tightening sanctions after Pyongyang’s latest nuclear test by condemning the new measures and pledging to double the efforts to protect the country’s sovereignty.

    According to Lankov, the United States is well aware that sanctions against North Korea are not particularly effective, but, at the same time, it is skeptical about talks with Pyongyang.

    "Washington understands that North Korea will not agree to give up nuclear weapons through talks," Lankov said.

    However, according to the expert, a strike on the government facilities or plants where missiles or nuclear weapons components are produced would prompt a counter-strike on Seoul, which could lead to a new Korean War.


    Lankov said that the United States was not ready to recognize North Korea as a nuclear state, but it may have to join the talks on the issue eventually.

    Konstantin Asmolov, with the Center for Korean Studies at the Institute for Far Eastern Studies (IFES) of the Russian Academy of Science, said that the United States did not want to launch negotiations on North Korea’s nuclear status as it may be a "bad example" for other countries.

    "The recognition of the nuclear status of North Korea will seriously undermine the whole existing world order system. This is the de facto recognition of the eradication of the existing program for the non-proliferation of nuclear weapons when there are only five nuclear states," Asmolov said.

    According to Asmolov, the appearance of the sixth nuclear state would give a signal to all countries that may wish to launch their own nuclear programs.

    North Korea has carried out sixth nuclear tests since 2006, claiming that during the latest one it successfully tested a hydrogen bomb that could be mounted on an intercontinental ballistic missile.

    Hot Button Issue: Latest Launches, Nuclear Tests Escalate Korean Crisis (97)


    Pentagon Chief Warns ‘Don’t Try It’ as North Korea Readies for Next Nuke Test
    Tillerson Says Imposing Oil Embargo on North Korea Will Be 'Very Difficult'
    South Korea Opposes Nuclear Weapons Deployment Over Risk of Arms Race With North
    confrontation, Pentagon, Democratic Republic of North Korea (DPRK), United States
    Community standardsDiscussion
    Comment via FacebookComment via Sputnik