04:56 GMT +325 March 2017
Live
    A Free Syrian Army fighter carries his weapon as he stands on a damaged building, in the east of the rebel-held town of Dael, in Deraa Governorate, Syria January 3, 2017.

    Even if Pentagon Sends Troops to Syria, Proxies 'Will Do the Bulk of Fighting'

    © REUTERS/ Alaa Al-Faqir
    Military & Intelligence
    Get short URL
    367114

    The Pentagon is rumored to be contemplating sending ground troops to Syria. Even if the Trump administration goes ahead with this plan, US service personnel is unlikely to be the one doing the bulk of fighting, Radzhab Safarov, head of the Russian Center for Modern Iran Studies, told Vzglyad.

    Should Washington put boots on the ground in Syria, it "will most likely delegate key responsibilities to the groups the US backs. Perhaps, they will create a new 'coalition.' The US will probably involve the Free Syrian Army (FSA); perhaps some Kurdish militias. In addition, they will involve armed forces of the Gulf countries. They could also reach certain agreements with Turkey, but this is highly unlikely since Ankara will not tolerate working together with the Syrian Kurds," he said.

    President Recep Tayyip Erdogan and his supporters maintain that the Syrian Kurds, primarily the Democratic Union Party (PYD) and its armed wing, the People's Protection Units (YPG), are affiliated with the Kurdistan Workers' Party (PKK), an organization which Ankara considers to be a terrorist group. As a result, Turkish authorities oppose any assistance to Kurdish fighters in Syria.

    For its part, Washington has relied extensively on the Kurds in its anti-Daesh efforts, much to Turkey's discontent. The Syrian Democratic Forces (SDF), largely made up of the YPG, have often been named as the key force in the operation aimed at liberating Raqqa, the so-called capital of Daesh's caliphate. However, Ankara is trying to prevent this from happening. Erdogan recently said that the Turkish military and its local allies will proceed to push Daesh out of Raqqa once the Syrian border town of al-Bab is fully liberated.

    Sergey Balmasov, an expert on the Middle East Institute at the Russian International Affairs Council, shared these sentiments, pointing to the Kurds as the Pentagon's natural ally.

    "Apart from the Kurds, there are numerous groups which say that they are affiliated with the Free Syrian Army. Perhaps, the United States will support them," he said.

    These comments came in response to unconfirmed reports that the Pentagon might recommend the White House to deploy conventional ground combat forces to Syria as part of a larger strategy to defeat and destroy Daesh. US President Donald Trump has directed US Secretary of Defense James Mattis to devise a viable strategy to put an end to the brutal group which must be presented to the administration by the end of February.

    Never miss a story again — sign up to our Telegram channel and we'll keep you up to speed!

    Related:

    Russian Long-Range Bombers Launch Cruise Missile Strikes on Daesh in Raqqa
    Several Countries Show Interest in Russian Drones Engaged in Syria Operation
    Russia is 'the Only State That Can Bring' Damascus to Speak With Syrian Rebels
    Turkish Forces 'Could Stay' in Syria's al-Bab After Its Liberation
    Tags:
    Syrian crisis, Syrian Kurds, ground operation, boots on the ground, Syrian conflict, Turkey, Syria, United States
    Community standardsDiscussion
    Comment via FacebookComment via Sputnik
    • Сomment

    All comments

    • avatar
      vigilante
      The US sending troops and using an unreliable mixture of FSA, Kurds etc.. as proxies?
      That was Flynn's idea as he is a fan of Erdogan and wanted to ensure his victory in the referendum
      I doubt James Mattis will go in that direction that is absurd.
      The Syrian army and the Russians will not tolerate any move of the Turkish army beyond Al Bab. The Turks know it and are pressuring the Russians by making the Astana negotiations harder. In response Russia will make the Al Bab 'liberation' claimed by Turkey as painful as possible by boosting the Syrian army and its militias. If Al Bab is not 'liberated' by April, Erdogan would get a blow in the referendum. Therefore Russia is indirectly pressuring Turkey to become more conciliant about the Kurds and to decline the US help
      The only realistic solution is for the USA to offer guarantees to Turkey that the Kurds will be controlled by the USA like it controlled the Kurds in Iraq and to allow the SDF to liberate Raqqa without the Syrian army. Bashar al Assad has clearly said that Al Raqqa was not a priority for the Syrian army.
      Any other solution seems doomed
    • siberianhusky
      Great plan of the Americans sending troops when that war in Syria is almost over.
      Then they can claim that they at least have won 1 war since WW2. Even then the Russians did all the heavy lifting.
      Winning wars is something they don't normally don't do. Apart from that one in 1983 when Granada had a few Cubans working on the airport and they thought that a few American medical student where in danger of them.
    Show new comments (0)