23:31 GMT +330 March 2017
    Su-35 super maneuverable multirole fighter

    Brand New Russian Su-35 and PAK FA Turn Pentagon's F-16 Into 'Relic of the Past'

    © Flickr/ Dmitry Terekhov
    Military & Intelligence
    Get short URL

    The F-16 Fighting Falcon has been a workhorse in the Pentagon's arsenal, but Russia's cutting-edge new aircraft, including the Sukhoi Su-35 and the Sukhoi PAK FA, have rendered the all-weather supersonic multirole aircraft, which has been in service since 1978, as "obsolete," defense and national security writer Kyle Mizokami asserted.

    The F-16 is "seriously outmatched by a new generation of Russian and Chinese fighters," he wrote for the National Interest.

    Mizokami named the Sukhoi Su-35 Flanker-E multirole air superiority fighter and the Sukhoi PAK FA fifth-generation stealth superiority fighter as a case in point.

    The Su-35, a heavily upgraded version of the Sukhoi Su-27, is a 4++ generation aircraft produced since 2007. The warplanes completed their first combat missions in Syria earlier this year.

    "The Su-35 may not be stealthy, but it can detect and engage the F-16 before the F-16 can detect it, and this puts the American plane at a big disadvantage. In a one-on-one fight, the F-16 will probably not even be able to get the Su-35 into dogfighting range, where the smaller fighter's legendary maneuverability would come into play," Mizokami explained.

    A T-50 fighter performs demonstration flight during the International Aerospace Salon (MAKS 2015) in Zhukovsky near Moscow
    © Sputnik/ Maksim Blinov
    A T-50 fighter performs demonstration flight during the International Aerospace Salon (MAKS 2015) in Zhukovsky near Moscow

    The gap between the F-16 and the Sukhoi PAK FA, also known as the T-50, is even more glaring.  The cutting edge aircraft is the first operational aircraft in Russian service to use stealth technology. The PAK FA is currently undergoing testing and is expected to enter service with the Russian Air Force and the Russian Navy in 2018.

    The fighter jet is meant to replace Russia's aging Mikoyan MiG-29s and Sukhoi Su-27s.

    PAK FA's "stealthy design will ultimately mean F-16s won't even detect their adversaries before they realize they are being targeted by beyond-visual-range guided missiles, launched by aircraft only visible on radar for the brief moment their internal weapons bay doors are open," the analyst noted.

    The F-16 could be upgraded to become more competitive, but the lack of stealth is the plane's ultimate weakness when compared to other advanced aircraft.

    "Thanks to PAK-FA and the J-20, [the F-16] days as a day-one frontline fighter are over. As the F-35 enters service with the United States and with its NATO and Asian allies, the F-16 begins its long, well-earned flight into the sunset," Mizokami said.

    PAK FA (Advanced Tactical Air Sistem) T-50
    © Sputnik/
    PAK FA (Advanced Tactical Air Sistem) T-50


    Russia Builds Glide Bomb Virtually Invisible to Radar
    Sneak Peek at Russia's Top-12 Mighty Weapons
    Russian Defense Ministry to Buy at Least 1 PAK FA Fighter Squadron in 2017
    First Prototype Engine for Russia’s Advanced Fighters to Be Ready by October
    stealth, stealth aircraft, technology, aircraft, military aircraft technology, military technology, Sukhoi PAK FA T-50, Su-35, United States, Russia
    Community standardsDiscussion
    Comment via FacebookComment via Sputnik
    • Сomment

    All comments

    • avatar
      F-16 replaced by a far more expenses sitting duck known as F-35 !
    • avatar
      edover3in reply toViTran(Show commentHide comment)
      ViTran, The messed up thing is, that in a US air force test, the F-16 defeated the F-35.
    • NATOisEVIL
      I just love that video. Awesome.
    • avatar
      ViTranin reply toedover3(Show commentHide comment)
      edover3, Yes ... I know ... but F number is Bigger so must be Better ... Lol !
    • avatar
      F35 is extremely limited in armaments as it is only stealthy with internal weapon systems to get more firepower additional external points will be fitted making it non stealthy.

      The big con to all and sundry is that the F-35 was primarily designed to penetrate deep into enemy territory with a high end tactical missile in its bomb bay for strategic surgical strikes.

      Its defence against a hi end fighters is more or less limited to its 30 mm cannon? or it must be defended by fighter escorts.

      The F-35 was never designed to replace F-16 that was reserved for Raptor or F-22 however owing to massive overruns on costs on development the F-22 production was limited and then disbanded as both could not be produced at the same time.

      These decisions were obviously made with a confidence that the Russian Airforce was effectively null and void.
      Or in strategic terms it did not matter as there would only be one major strike of Russia by the combined forces of all nations with F-35 bombers armed with smaller tactical nukes on board.
    • avatar
      While there are very dangerous aspects and capacities to the US military industrial political complex, there are also very corrupt and dysfunctional outcomes as well.
      It is almost as if they have secured the largest sum of money ever devoted to a weapon and promised impossibly superlative performances to get it and no one in their fundamentally corrupt legislatures, executive or mainstream media seems to be seriously concerned with this wholesale abuse of public money.
    • nshahhsh
      To those FBs comments..

      Guess the reasons sputnik compared it to a F16 is due to there's nothing so special about that junk to be compared to.. Lol..! Nevertheless.. it still shows that the F16.. one of the best for its era..!
    • avatar
      It was just used more against third world countries or nations under a no fly restriction F-16 was never superior to Su-27 and Mig 29 in fact once the R70 range of missiles came into use the F-16 was beaten hands down in a properly organised competition staged with German Luftwaffe who still had squadrons of Su-27 and Mig 29 end result was 18 hits to 2.
    • avatar
      "Thanks to PAK-FA and the J-20, [the F-16] days as a frontline fighter are over. As the F-35 enters service with the United States and with its NATO and Asian allies, the F-16 begins its long, well-earned flight into the sunset," Mizokami said.

      He doesn't know what he's talking about F-35 cant replace F-16 US is now upgrading with better sensors/radars and missiles to fair better with more highly advanced and superior Su-35s and Mig 35 (latest variants)
    • avatar
      nshahhsh...... your post is so archaic catch up with the news mostly US military experts in last 12 months saying Russian Fighters and Chinese J-20? are serious threats leaping ahead in speed, radar and firepower.

      With US needing to do a lot more work on upgrades of avionics, radar and missiles to catch up? I remember posts 2 years ago by the hundreds like yours, not any more they have had to swallow the bitter truth.

      I must admit it would have been really tough to give up the Fly boy ace tag.
    • Kinky
      I won't believe in anything until Russians actually shoot down an enemy jet. Till then, it's all promo.
    • avatar
      That will be hard Kinky as they dont want to get within a bulls roar of a Su-35S? when the comms blurts Su-35 at 200 km they scatter.
      As there just coming into range of the R77-LRATA missile that are super deadly.
    • avatar
      copiusin reply toKinky(Show commentHide comment)
      Relic MIGs were shooting down US aircraft faster than can be built.
      Ask McCain. He is an expert at being shot down. Ha ha ha
    • avatar
      F35 was made to penetrate enemy lines.
      Nothing said about leaving it alive.
      F35 pilots will be sitting ducks.. Costing taxpayers lots of lost dollars.
    • American Socialist
      i'd like to see a Russian Military outfit post a comparison between the SU-35, PAK FA and F-35, F-22. i truly believe Russia's SU-35 will out-perform America's F-35.
    • avatar
      Open eyes! These are obselete aircraft and really no match for the American TR-3B Astra.
    • avatar
      Isn't the F-16 a 50 year old design? It's been around forever. I will have to see the real world outcome. As the new planes may be as good as said but only combat will answer that. Untrained pilots will be a big issue as well. We will see as they may be very good planes but they look cool.
    Show new comments (0)