- Sputnik International
World
Get the latest news from around the world, live coverage, off-beat stories, features and analysis.

Surprise! America’s New Nuclear Missile Will Cost Way More Than Projected

© AP Photo / U.S. Air Force In this photo provided by U.S. Air Force, an unarmed Minuteman III intercontinental ballistic missile launches during an operational test on Saturday, Feb. 20, 2016 at Vandenberg Air Force Base, California.
In this photo provided by U.S. Air Force, an unarmed Minuteman III intercontinental ballistic missile launches during an operational test on Saturday, Feb. 20, 2016 at Vandenberg Air Force Base, California. - Sputnik International
Subscribe
The US government doesn’t have the best track record when it comes to making accurate cost predictions.

When the F-35 Joint Strike fighter program was first proposed, officials predicted that it would cost taxpayers roughly $200 billion. Over one decade later, the cost has ballooned past $1 trillion, making the fighter the most expensive weapon ever built. Despite the high price tag, the aircraft has faced a number of critical setbacks.

Lockheed Martin, another leader in the industry with its F-35, F-22, F-16, F-117, and C-130s saw shares grow more than 3.53%. - Sputnik International
US Plans to Modernize Nuclear Triad are ‘Foolish’

As the US Air Force (USAF) seeks to develop a new nuclear-armed missile, the program is showing similar signs of substantial cost overruns.

Last year, the USAF estimated that it would cost $62.3 billion to replace its aging Minuteman III intercontinental ballistic missile. A memo from Frank Kendall, the Pentagon’s chief weapons buyer, now places that number closer to $85 billion, a 36 percent increase.

"There is significant uncertainty about program costs," Kendall wrote, according to Bloomberg, "[because] the historical data is limited and there has been a long gap since the last [such program]."

Small Diameter Bomb II (SDB II) - Sputnik International
US Air Force to Acquire 250 Next Generation Air-Launched, Precision Glide Bombs

The new estimate includes research and development, procurement, and related military construction.

While Kendall maintains that $85 million is "the most reasonable estimate of program cost at this point," even this increased quote is at the low end. Kingston Reif, an analyst with the Arms Control Association, said that the Pentagon’s insistence on low-balling estimates puts the overall program at risk, according to Bloomberg.

"From a good-government perspective, [it is] better to build in contingency and plan for and prioritize around a bigger bill now, lest a sudden big cost increase threaten to wreck the budget and the program five to 10 years from now," he said.

Which may actually benefit the greater good. As the Obama Administration considers formalizing a no-first-use nuclear policy, US military officials have argued in favor of keeping the offensive option on the table. USAF Secretary Deborah Lee James has been one of the most vocal to oppose the policy.

Military vehicles carry HQ-12 surface-to-air missile batteries during a parade commemorating the 70th anniversary of Japan's surrender during World War II. - Sputnik International
Asia
Arms Race: China’s New Missile Defense System to Defend Against US, South Korea

"Personally, I have questions about it. I would be very concerned with it," she said.

Separately, the USAF is also pursuing a Long-Range Standoff (LRSO) weapon that could cost taxpayers at least $20 billion.

"LRSO is a critical element of the United States’ nuclear deterrence strategy," Maj. Gen. Scott Jansson, commander of the Air Force Nuclear Weapons Center and Air Force program executive officer for strategic systems, told Defense One last month.

"Releasing this solicitation is a critical step toward affordably recapitalizing the aging air leg of the nuclear triad."

Newsfeed
0
To participate in the discussion
log in or register
loader
Chats
Заголовок открываемого материала