13:28 GMT +322 September 2019
Listen Live
    Will future Maverick and Goose wannabes merely end up as drone operators? Navy pilots' dog-fighting days may be numbered as the department's secretary says the F-35 joint strike fighter (JSF) will be the last the last manned strike fighter aircraft the Navy should commission.

    Really Combat Ready? F-35A Still Undergoing Ejector Seat Modifications

    © Flickr/ Department of Defense/ Marvin Lynchard
    Military & Intelligence
    Get short URL
    7139
    Subscribe

    Even though the F-35A has been declared ready for battle, its ejection seat is still undergoing tests after an analysis showed it was a danger to pilots.

    In June, a government report found that pilots weighing less than 136 pounds faced a high likelihood of suffering a fatal neck injury upon ejecting from the F-35. Pilots weighing between 136 and 165 pounds also face an “elevated level of risk” due to the defective ejection seat.

    Modifications to improve the seat’s safety are still ongoing. A source familiar with the project said the latest round of tests is continuing through mid-September.

    Part of the problem relates to the five-pound helmet, which could cause severe neck damage upon ejection. The F-35 Joint Program Office is seeking a lighter version that could be ready by the end of the year.

    "We’ll have our first Gen 3 light helmets now aligned with the seat in November of 2016, so we can remove the restriction for the lightweight pilots weighing under 136 pounds," said Gen. Chris Bogdan, according to FlightGlobal.

    "We’ve tested helmets with similar mass properties, and we think it’s going to work."

    But the seat itself, a Martin-Baker US-16E, is also an issue. The Air Force is considering two modifications. One is a “lightweight crew sequencer switch” that slows the deployment of the seat’s parachute. The second is a new support panel.

    "Both have performed very well in tests," Martin-Baker spokesman Richard Johnson told Military.com.

    If the tests are successful, the improved seat will be standard in all new F-35As.

    Abandoning the Martin-Baker seat altogether is another option. In June, a US Air Force source said in June that this could add additional costs to the $1 trillion fighter program.

    "Instead of one seat, you have two separate seats with supplies/supply chain duplication," the source said told Defense News. "That would drive costs skyrocketing for everybody because it impacts quantity of scale because the Air Force has the largest majority. Then costs go up for both the Air Force and the rest of the enterprise."

    Air Combat Command chief Gen. Herbert Carlisle, however, remains confident in the Martin-Baker modifications.

    "I think they’ve made very good progress in solving the challenges that they had," he said. "And it appears, at least at first blush, they may have gotten to the full envelope in a representative manner, with some modifications to the seat."

    News of the still-unsafe seat comes one week after the F-35A was deemed combat ready.

    "With the F-35A, the Air Force now has a fighter combining next-generation radar-evading stealth, supersonic speed, fighter agility and advanced logistical support with the most powerful and comprehensive integrated sensor package for any fighter aircraft in history," Lockheed Martin said in a statement.

    Related:

    Out With the Old: World War II-Era Factory Retrofitted for F-35 Assembly
    Denmark Plans to Purchase New US F-35 Fighter Jets
    Flying a Kite: Epic F-35 Deal Leaves Denmark Vulnerable and Penniless
    Tags:
    ejector seat, F-35, Martin-Baker, US Air Force, Pentagon, Herbert Carlisle, Richard Johnson, Chris Bogdan, United States
    Community standardsDiscussion
    Comment via FacebookComment via Sputnik