18:46 GMT24 February 2020
Listen Live
    Military & Intelligence
    Get short URL

    After spending upwards of $1.5 trillion of US taxpayer money towards corporate welfare for arms producer Lockheed Martin the ensuing damage to the defense budget will cripple the US Air Force’s ability to field a proper fleet of the fifth-generation jets.

    The head of Air Combat Command expressed concern with the current F-35 buy rate plan cautioning the need to build up the military branch’s fighter jet inventory at a fast pace in order to prepare for the global security threats of tomorrow, but Air Force civilian chief signaled Wednesday that there is simply not enough money to field the desired fleet of warplanes.

    In an interview with Air Force Times, Air Force Secretary Deborah Lee James dashed hopes that the military branch would acquire F-35s at a faster rate than the current plan saying that boosting the number of active-duty airmen is the primary priority at this time.

    "It’s all a matter of money. I would love to buy also, but I don’t see that as more urgent than staying the course to increase our end strength," said Secretary James. "Increasing that end strength is the top thing. We think it’s the top thing for all our senior leaders."

    Gen. Herbert "Hawk" Carlisle, the Commander of Air Combat Command, disagrees with his civilian counterpart’s assessment telling reporters on Tuesday that he was concerned about the service’s F-35 buy rate which hovers around 40 aircraft per year until fiscal year 2021 when the number jumps up to 60. Carlisle explained that the Air Force must buy at least 60 aircraft per year in the near term to replace defective or obsolete warplanes.

    "I need more [F-35s] sooner to replace legacy airplanes and airplanes that are going to require money to do service life extension and do capability increases if I don’t replace them with the F-35," he said. "So I would like to see the numbers go up to at least 60 if I can. 80 would be optimal, but given the fiscal constraints that we’re in today, 80 would be very, very hard to get."

    The conservative think tank, The Heritage Foundation, released a report on Thursday siding with Gen. Hawk Carlisle calling for the Air Force to procure its full 1,763-aircraft program of record throughout the life of the program and noting that once full-rate production begins the aircraft’s price tag will lower becoming cost-competitive with similar fighter jets.

    "The Air Force is currently deferring the purchase/cashing in on F-35As to pay for other critical needs that have gone unfunded or underfunded by Congress," said John Venable, the senior defense fellow who wrote the report. "That practice needs to end immediately."

    Ultimately it appears unlikely that the US Air Force will be in a position to boost its haul of F-35A fighter jets given the exorbitant cost of the project on the front end. As Richard Aboulafia, a defense analyst for the Teal group explained, "You’re left with two choices. You either grow the top-line [budget] – good luck with that – or you take cash away from the bomber, which doesn’t appear to be likely."


    US Air Force F-35 Fifth Generation Jet Reaches Initial Operational Capability
    Nice Problem to Have? F-35 Super Stealth Power Makes Training Drills Tough
    Costly F-35 Bankrupts US Navy's Hope for a Sixth-Generation Fighter Jet
    'Jewel in Our Hands': US Marines Ready to Send F-35 to War
    F-35 II Joint Strike Fighter Program, F-35, US Air Force, US Department of Defense (DoD), Pentagon, White House, Ash Carter, Deborah Lee James, Hawk Carlisle, Herbert Carlisle, Barack Obama, Washington
    Community standardsDiscussion
    Comment via SputnikComment via Facebook