09:33 GMT04 August 2020
Listen Live
    Military & Intelligence
    Get short URL

    A leading US think tank with considerable ties to the US defense industry recommends that NATO members massively increase their naval expenditures to tackle the threat of Russia’s secret submarines that nobody can really confirm exist.

    A report by naval experts warns that Russia already has a small but sophisticated fleet of submarines capable of launching missile strikes across the globe and claim that Moscow has stepped up its secret submarine program to 'Cold War' levels leaving NATO members to scramble to develop its defenses.

    That is, at least, according to a report by the Center for Strategic and International Studies (CSIS) whose co-author Andrew Metrick claims "Russia operates a small number of very small, nuclear powered submarines that are capable of diving in excess of several thousand meters."

    "You can imagine what a clandestine deployable deep submergence vehicle could be used for," says Metrick without actually explaining what this purported capability of the Russian navy portends. "It’s pretty scary to think about some of the types of missions."

    Metrick calls the secret program, which Russian officials have not confirmed the existence of, “the most shadowy part of the Russian undersea apparatus” and claims that it is "not operated by their navy, it’s operated by a separate branch of their Ministry of Defense."

    The report claims that these ships are armed with electronic warfare equipment, long-range cruise missiles, torpedoes and mines illustrating the rich imagination of US defense analysts.

    So does Russia have a secretive army of deadly small-sized submarines or is the Western defense industry looking for a ripe excuse to sell more naval military hardware?

    The report provides a caution that the number of US submarines is dwindling and says that the UK’s Royal Navy is at its "lowest ebb" in terms of naval firepower. Breaking Defense interviewed Jerry Hendrix, a retired captain with another hawkish US think tank, the Center for New American Security, who said "NATO is in a bad place as an alliance with regard to Russia’s underwater resurgence."

    Not surprisingly, the report’s recommendation is that NATO increase its defense expenditures or risk being toppled by Putin’s super submarines – the mythical threat of Russian aggression and return of Cold War-style rhetoric appears to be the gift that keeps on giving for America’s defense industry.


    Trump Says He Will No Longer Be 'Nice' to Hillary Clinton
    Donald Trump’s Acceptance Speech Draws More Viewers Than Clinton’s Address
    Is Donald Trump Working for Big Brother?
    Will Trump Win the Christian Vote?
    new Cold War, secret submarine, NATO, White House, Royal Navy, Navy, Russian Navy, Kremlin, Ash Carter, John Kerry, Theresa May, Barack Obama, Vladimir Putin, South China Sea, Berlin, Washington, Moscow, Russia
    Community standardsDiscussion