15:59 GMT27 February 2021
Listen Live
    Military & Intelligence
    Get short URL

    Russia’s demonstration of long-range cruise missile capabilities during the military campaign in Syria has raised renewed concerns in Washington over US abilities to defend against all classes of missile threats, former US Missile Defense Agency Deputy Director Brig. Gen. Kenneth Todorov said on Monday.

    WASHINGTON (Sputnik) — At the outset of the Moscow’s anti-terrorism campaign in Syria in October 2015, Russian guided missile ships deployed in the Caspian Seaired fired 26 long-range cruise missiles at a range of 1,000 miles, successfully hitting their 11 intended targets.

    "We have long known that the Russians have cruise missiles, but this [Russia’s recent actions in Syria] was our first opportunity to witness their operational use at such an extended range, a fact not lost on those who defend our US homeland," Todorov stated in an article addressing the cost of missile defense.

    The Russian demonstration of capabilities raised the need for the United States to develop "Integrated Air and Missile Defense (IAMD) systems" to enhance the US response to "a range of threats — missile and air — and not just one domain or the other," Todorov explained.

    In the past year, a key US cruise missile defense program, the Joint Land Attack Cruise Missile Defense Elevated Netted Sensor (JLENS), had its funding cut by the US Congress.

    While conducting a test flight in October 2015, the system, a large blimp with missile sensors and surveillance capabilities, broke free of its tether causing widespread damage to homes and power lines.

    Prior to having its funding cut, the program represented a $2.7 billion investment by the Department of Defense.


    Silent Hunter: Russia’s Akula Subs Upgraded With Kalibr Cruise Missiles
    Russia Test-Firing New Hypersonic Zircon Cruise Missiles for 5th-Gen Subs
    Russian Aviation Fired 20 Cruise Missiles Since Syrian Operation Started
    cruise missiles, US, Russia
    Community standardsDiscussion