11:42 GMT25 September 2020
Listen Live
    Military & Intelligence
    Get short URL

    A transport solicitation found on a federal website reveals the US government keeps shipping weapons to Al-Qaeda and other belligerent groups in Syria.

    According to the British military information agency Jane's, two transport solicitations were found on a US government website FedBizGov.org (Federal Business Opportunities), that looked for shipping companies to transport explosive material from Constanta, Romania, to port of Aqaba in Jordania on behalf of the US Navy's Military Sealift Command.

    "The cargo listed in the document included AK-47 rifles, PKM general-purpose machine guns, DShK heavy machine guns, RPG-7  rocket launchers, and 9K111M Faktoria anti-tank guided weapon (ATGW) systems," says Jane's.

    The solicitation was released in November, 2015. One ship with nearly one thousand tons of weapons and ammo left Constanta in Romania on December. It sailed to Agalar in Turkey which is a military pier and then to Aqaba in Jordan. Another ship with more than two-thousand tons of weapons and ammo left in late March, followed the same route and was last recorded on its way to Aqaba on April 4.

    According to Zero Hedge, such cargo weight equals millions of rifles, machine-guns and mortar shots, as well as thousands of new light and heavy weapons and hundreds of new anti-tank missiles.

    Neither Turkey nor Jordan use such weapons designed in the USSR. This hints these weapons are going to Syria where, as has been reported for years by multiple independent sources, half of them go directly to al-Qaeda which operates in Syria under the alias Jabhat al-Nusra.


    From Handguns to Anti-Aircraft Missiles, Study Reveals Facebook Arms Trade
    Sticking to Your Guns: Moscow's Arms Shipments to Baku are Above Board
    Turkish Arms Factory Director Caught Selling MPT-76 Rifle Designs to US
    Egypt and France to Sign €1 billion Arms Deal
    arms supplies, US government, Turkey, Syria, Jordan, Romania
    Community standardsDiscussion