Listen Live
    China's J-20 stealth fighter

    Against the Clock: China's Air Force Will Be on Par With US' by 2030

    © Flickr/ Times Asi
    Military & Intelligence
    Get short URL
    8465
    Subscribe

    By 2030 China will be on par or exceed the United States in terms of its air force capabilities, American defense expert Dave Majumdar writes, adding that the People's Liberation Army Air Force is rapidly fielding newer and much more capable weaponry.

    Beijing is bolstering its military capabilities and soon will be on par with the United States Air Force or even outperform it, Dave Majumdar, the Defense Editor of The National Interest, underscores.

    "China's People's Liberation Army Air Force (PLAAF) will be able to match or exceed the United States Air Force in the number of fielded combat aircraft by 2030. Moreover, while American forces will still maintain an edge, the technological gap between the two great powers will have closed significantly between now and then," Majumdar writes in one of his latest articles.

    Citing General Mark Welsh, Chief of Staff of the US Air Force, the defense expert notes that in comparison with the Asian competitor the US has a "couple thousand more aircraft."

    However, during his testimony at the House Appropriations Committee's subcommittee on March 2, General Welsh admitted that "at the rate they're [China] building, the models they're fielding, by 2030 they will have fielded — they will have made up that 2,000 aircraft gap and they will be at least as big-if not bigger — than our air forces."

    But that is part of the story, the defense expert emphasizes. The truth of the matter is that the PLAAF is fielding newer and sophisticated aircraft: in particular, stealthy Chengdu J-20 and Shenyang J-31, or upgraded versions of the J-11D and J-16.

    "Moreover, China continues to import advanced Russian-made fighters including the fearsome Sukhoi Su-35S Flanker-E," Majumdar emphasizes.

    Su-35 super maneuverable multirole fighter
    Su-35 super maneuverable multirole fighter

    Indeed, the $2 billion dollar arms deal was concluded by Moscow and Beijing last year. In accordance will the contract, 24 Russian Su-35 fighter jets, advanced, super-maneuverable multi-role aircraft will be delivered to China later this year.

    "We are not keeping up with that kind of technology development," Welsh said, as quoted by Majumdar.

    "[China] will have a lot of technology that's better than the stuff we've had before," the general added.

    Indeed, China is very serious about "getting better."

    According to Xinhua, Beijing is setting up a conglomerate that will bring together three aircraft engine manufacturers: Sichuan Chengfa Aero Science & Technology Co., Avic Aviation Engine Corp. and Avic Aero-Engine Controls Co.

    "The move will improve China's standing in plane design and manufacturing. Though one of the biggest aviation markets, the country is still heavily reliant on imported engines," China's state-owned media outlet reports.

    Remarkably, last year, Russia and China reached an agreement aimed at extending subsidized loans to speed up work on joint long-haul aircraft and heavy helicopter projects.

    "With regard to joint projects in aviation, the creation of a wide-body aircraft [and] developing a heavy helicopter, we have agreed on the possibility of allocating preferential loans to work at a faster pace," Russian Deputy Prime Minister Dmitry Rogozin told journalists in October 2015.

    "We must enter the market with a product that will drop the jaws of potential buyers," Rogozin stressed.

    Related:

    Calling the Shots: Indonesia to Buy Russian Su-35 Jets
    Su-35's 'Splendid Performance' in Syria Stirs Appetite Among Buyers
    US 'Very Concerned' About Advanced Russian Air Defense Systems
    Tags:
    J-16 fighter jet, development, helicopter, weapons, J-31, Su-35, J-11D fighter aircraft, Chinese Chengdu J-20 fighter jet, People's Liberation Army Air Force, US Air Force, Pentagon, China, United States, Russia
    Community standardsDiscussion
    Comment via FacebookComment via Sputnik