04:05 GMT +310 December 2016
Live
    Household

    We 'Might Use the Internet of Things' to Spy on You - US Intelligence Chief

    © Photo: Pixabay
    Military & Intelligence
    Get short URL
    11100059

    As the Internet of Things (IoT) takes over more virtual territory, so do hackers and so can spies. The US intelligence chief has admitted for the first time that smart household devices connected to the internet can increase surveillance opportunities for intelligence agencies.

    "In the future, intelligence services might use the IoT for identification, surveillance, monitoring, location tracking, and targeting for recruitment or to gain access to networks or user credentials," James Clapper, US director of National Intelligence told the Senate.

    What Clapper is basically saying is that smart devices connected to a wireless network in your home, like a baby monitor, a television, a speaker system, a fridge and even a thermostat can be infiltrated by intelligence officers to collect data in real time. 

    Vulnerabilities in the Internet of Things have already been exposed. A recent report, "The Internet of Things: Privacy & Security in a Connected World", warns that wearable technology, web cams, 'smart' home hubs and Internet-connected cameras can be vulnerable to hack attacks.

    Nick Pollard, of Guidance Software told Computer Business Weekly that cybercriminals see IoT as an easy target.

    "As the vast scope of the IoT broadens as well as the security risks associated with the IoT, manufacturers of IoT devices perhaps do not have resources available to ensure that every loophole or flaw has been covered. The potential therefore exists for successful security breaches to be exploited on a black market."

    Another report titled "Don't Panic, Making Progress on the 'Going Dark' Debate" takes the debate over the vulnerability of the IoT one step further, suggesting that it "has the potential to drastically change surveillance", offering opportunities for surveillance through an alternative channel if encrypted channels are blocked.

    "The still images, video, and audio captured by these devices may enable real-time intercept and recording with after-the-fact access. Thus an inability to monitor an encrypted channel could be mitigated by the ability to monitor from afar a person through a different channel."

    So, while privacy campaigners battle against government demands for access to encrypted data — intelligence agencies could just use another channel, provided by the IoT to gather the desired data.

    The report says the IoT market is forecast to grow into a multitrillion dollar industry within the next decade, incorporating everyday items.

    "Appliances and products ranging from televisions and toasters to bed sheets, light bulbs, cameras, toothbrushes, door locks, cars, watches and other wearables are being packed with sensors and wireless connectivity," the report states.

    "Phillips, GE, Amazon, Apple, Google, Microsoft, Tesla, Samsung, and Nike are all working on products with embedded IoT functionality, with sensors ranging from gyroscopes, accelerometers, magnetometers, proximity sensors, microphones, speakers, barometers, infrared sensors, fingerprint readers, and radio frequency antennae with the purpose of sensing, collecting, storing, and analyzing finegrained information about their surrounding environments."

    The report concludes — and concurs with the statement made by US intelligence chief James Clapper, that:

    "These forces are on a trajectory towards a future with more opportunities for surveillance."

    And it appears government agencies are ready to take them.

    Related:

    Internet of Things Will Never Be Safe Enough
    Internet Search Engine Snoops on Webcams Around the World
    Smart Hacking Into Your Home Hub Could Lock You in Your Own Room
    When Carjacking Became 'Carhacking'
    Tags:
    network, smart devices, intelligence agencies, encryption, spying, snooping, hacking, security, surveillance, privacy, Internet, US Senate, US National Intelligence, World, United States
    Community standardsDiscussion
    Comment via FacebookComment via Sputnik
    • Сomment

    All comments

    • cast235
      Those are VERY old news.
    • maxxus
      It's called factory farming of humans. That's the intention of these monsters.

      AI or quantum computing and we'll all be tracked 24/7 through perfect face & voice recognition, etc. We fight the NSA now or accept being farm animals.
    • maxxusin reply tocast235(Show commentHide comment)
      cast235, is that the meme of the day? "Oh, it's all old news"?? Nice try, but FAIL.
    • sakissel
      Krikey! Ya can't even break wind in private anymore! Disgusting!
    • maxxusin reply tosakissel(Show commentHide comment)
      sakissel, that would turn these peeping Tom freaks on. Maybe AI could make smellovision a reality.
    • siberianhusky
      Haven't they not done this already? They wouldn't tell us anyway if they did..

      Off to the FIMA camps.
    • maxxusin reply tosiberianhusky(Show commentHide comment)
      siberianhusky, I'm afraid they'd chose the Indonesian model of handling dissidents (mass murder). The NSA lacks an enforcement wing, thus they militarize and hire emotionally disturbed trigger happy thugs as cops.
    • siberianhuskyin reply tomaxxus(Show commentHide comment)
      maxxus,
      How about Homeland Security ? A perfect muscle companion for the NSA, what about their massive billions of .223 hollow points that are not allowed in military conflicts. Again what about the rumoured FIMA camps ?
    • michael
      yes, this has been spoken about before. I seem to remember it being reported on the bbc within the past 12 months or so. But, being stated openly by the DNI is another matter. :)
    • maxxusin reply tomichael(Show commentHide comment)
      michael, that's standard psywar tactics. Let information out in dabs and dribbles and then later, when confirmed, say 'oh, how boring, that's old news.' When it's actually very radical.
    • michaelin reply tomaxxus(Show commentHide comment)
      maxxus, and dangerous! But as you infer the attention span of the public..... :)
    Show new comments (0)