08:17 GMT +323 September 2019
Listen Live
    Boeing concept image of the New Generation Bomber & Long Range Strike Bomber

    Does US Air Force Really Know How Many Strategic Bombers It Needs?

    © Wikipedia / Mark Schierbecker
    Military & Intelligence
    Get short URL
    259
    Subscribe

    The US Air Force is about to award a multibillion-dollar contract for the design of a next-generation strategic bomber but it could well be wrong on how many it needs to meet challenges which the United States faces.

    Two teams are vying for the deal some say will be worth as much as $80 billion — Northrop Grumman and Boeing / Lockheed Martin. The winner will be able to manufacture as many as a hundred new aircraft, which are expected to become operational in a decade.

    "My belief quite frankly is 80 to 100 aircraft are not going to be enough to replace the B-1 and B-52 fleet, even though it's capability against the target set will be greater," Lieutenant General Robert J. Elder Jr. told the US House Armed Services Committee.

    The US Air Force cares for numbers but the ones on its mind have to do with spending. Both teams were told that the Long Range Strike Bomber program could not repeat the fate of the Advanced Technology Bomber (ATB) project, which gave birth to the B-2, or the Joint Strike Fighter (JSF) program, responsible for creating the F-35.

    The B-2 Spirit, also known simply as the Stealth Bomber, and the Lockheed Martin F-35 Lightning II are notorious for being extremely expensive pieces of military hardware. The US Air Force appears to be making every effort to avoid this mistake.

    B-2 Spirit
    B-2 Spirit

    The new strategic bomber will have to cost less than $550 million in fiscal 2010 dollars apiece. However, the Pentagon is already spending a lot of money on the new design and the funding will likely go through the roof, defense analyst David Axe observed.

    The development expenditure for the new bomber will increase from $1 billion in 2015 to more than $3 billion in 2018, and this trend will only be reinforced in the years to come, he pointed out.

    Meanwhile, the US fleet of strategic bombers is rapidly aging.

    "Our capabilities are withering and we have less than a hundred combat ready bombers with an average age of 38 years. The older bombers we have are simply not survivable in the face of modern air defenses and … we are going to live with them for quite a bit longer. The new B-2s remain potent but few in numbers," Elder noted.

    Even though the winner will be announced this fall, development will not start in the near future.

    "Once the Air Force announces the winner, it is likely the loser will file a protest, kicking off a months-long review of the secretive procurement process before work can begin in earnest on designing the aircraft," Amy Butler wrote for Aviation Week.

    Related:

    Next Gen B-3 Bomber Will Cost $25Bln More Than US Air Force Thought
    US Next-Gen B-3 Bombers Could Remain in Chinese Airspace For an Hour
    'Silly Exercise'? F-35 Fighter to Meet Face-to-Face With A-10 'Warthog'
    Pentagon Officials at Odds With Top Generals Over F-35 Review
    Tags:
    strategic bomber, military hardware, long range strike bomber, aircraft, B-2 Spirit Stealth Bomber, Lockheed Martin F-35C Joint Strike Fighter, US Air Force, United States
    Community standardsDiscussion
    Comment via FacebookComment via Sputnik