05:54 GMT28 October 2020
Listen Live
    Military & Intelligence
    Get short URL
    0 35
    Subscribe

    The Freedom Act signed into law by US President Barack Obama last week will do nothing to affect the continued mass data collection under the PRISM program run jointly by the US National security Agency and the UK's GCHQ intelligence service, according to sources.

    The Freedom Act ended the system exposed by former NSA contractor Edward Snowden, who revealed that the US spy agency collected and searched records of phone calls. The passing of the Act was hailed as the most significant curb on the government's investigative authorities since the 1970s. But sources close to the NSA say it's practically inconsequential in the universe of the NSA's vast digital spying operations and its major project, PRISM. 

    PRISM was first publicly revealed in the The Washington Post and The Guardian, based on allegations by Edward Snowden who had been a National Security Agency contractor. According to leaked NSA slides, PRISM allowed the NSA to compel companies — including Microsoft, Yahoo, Google, Facebook, PalTalk, AOL, Skype, YouTube and Apple — to grant them access to users' personal data on their servers.

    Snowden also revealed that the NSA and GCHQ directly intercept cables connected to the US (through the UPSTREAM program) and the UK (under the TEMPORA program). These cables carry most of the word's communications, and a leaked slide from GCHQ expressly says they are intent on "Mastering the Internet".

    Limited Damage to Data Mass Surveillance

    Unlike the phone records program which the Freedom Act curbed, PRISM has proven instrumental in foiling terrorist plots, and lawmakers in the US were loath to tinker with it. According to CIO Today, NSA leaders are shedding few tears over losing the authority to collect Americans' phone records, former officials say. Independent reviews of the program found that it wasn't a critical tool, and former NSA officials revealed that some inside the agency had wanted to abandon it. 

    The only reason the NSA didn't propose keeping the records with the phone companies years ago, former NSA Director Keith Alexander has said, is that no one wanted to seek legislation from Congress while the program remained a secret.

    "The damage that's been done to our intelligence capabilities is modest," said Stewart Baker, a former NSA general counsel. 

    Related:

    Reforming NSA Requires Taking Away Their Money - Whistleblower
    World’s Oldest Peace Group Urges EU to Cut Ties With US Over Spying Row
    Snowden: Privacy in US Still Under Threat After Patriot Act Expired
    Tags:
    phone surveillance, data retention, Freedom Act, whistleblower, spying, data collection, leaked documents, intelligence, terrorism, NSA spying, surveillance, British Government Communications Headquarters (GCHQ), National Security Agency (NSA), Congress, Edward Snowden, Europe, US, United Kingdom
    Community standardsDiscussion