08:21 GMT +317 December 2018
Listen Live
    Concerns that a cyberattack could start a nuclear war could be addressed by taking nuclear weapons off of high alert, says a top US military commander, but neither the US nor Russia wants to make that move.

    US Commander: Take Nukes Off High Alert or Risk Hackers Starting a War

    © AP Photo / Charlie Riedel
    Military & Intelligence
    Get short URL
    0 206

    Concerns that a cyberattack could start a nuclear war could be addressed by taking nuclear weapons off of high alert, says a top US military commander, but neither the US nor Russia wants to make that move.

    Retired Gen. James Cartwright — who was vice chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff before retiring in 2011 — told the Associated Press that "de-alerting" nuclear weapons could reduce the likelihood of launching them in response to a false attack warning. 

    Just adding a little more time necessary to launch — which would do nothing to affect the deterrent value of the weapons — could make all the difference, said Cartwright, who was also the head of Strategic Command from 2004 to 2007. 

    The US has evaluated this option in the past and consistently rejected it, and with US-Russia relations at a tense moment over the crisis in Ukraine, it is unlikely either nuclear superpower will agree to any steps that might give the other a perceived edge.

    Cartwright said that its an idea that should be revisited since "the sophistication of the cyberthreat has increased exponentially" in recent years.

    "It is reasonable to believe that that threat has extended itself" into nuclear weapons systems, he added. "Have they been penetrated? I don't know. Is it reasonable technically to assume they could be? Yes."

    The US currently has 450 Minuteman 3 missiles ready to launch from underground silos within minutes of a presidential order, day or night. Cartwright has proposed a system that would require 24 to 72 hours before the missiles would be ready to launch. 

    The administration believes those missiles need "to be ready and effective and able to prosecute the mission at any point in time," Robert Scher, the top Pentagon official dealing with nuclear policy told Congress this month about why "de-alerting" was not an option. 

    Next Close Call Could be Catastrophe

    Cartwright is not a lone voice on this issue, though he may be rarer within the military itself. 

    The Union of Concerned Scientists cites many high-level government and military officials who have called for "de-alerting" including former President George W. Bush who, in a campaign speech in 2000 called the high-alert status "an unnecessary vestige of Cold War confrontation."

    As the UCS explains, during the Cold War, "Military strategists feared a 'bolt from the blue' Soviet first strike, involving hundreds or thousands of nuclear weapons that would compromise our ability to retaliate."

    This meant that the US military was so concerned that weapons be ready to launch quickly that — to give one almost unbelieveable example —  for 20 years, the launch code on every Minuteman silo was 00000000.

    Groups like the UCS and the Nuclear Threat Initiative highlight recorded incidents of close calls where technical malfunction — not even a purposeful malicious cyber attack — nearly led to accidental nuclear launches. 

    Perhaps the most often cited of these is the incident in 1980, under President Jimmy Carter, when a defective computer chip caused a false report that the Soviet Union had launched over 2000 nuclear missiles. US missile crews had their safes open, and bomber crews were starting their engines before it was declared a false alarm. 

    The Global Zero Commission,  which works to eliminate the world's nuclear arsenals, recently published a report — co-authored by Cartwright and the commission's founder, Dr. Bruce Blair — which they will present to the United Nations on Thursday. They propose phasing out the high-alert status of US and Russian nuclear arsenals. Twenty percent would be de-alerted the first year and all would be gradually brought off high alert over 10 years. 

    The report calls cyberthreats "a new wild card in the deck."

    Related:

    US-Iran Diplomatic Ties Unlikely to Thaw Despite Nuclear Deal - Iranian FM
    UK Conservatives Refuse to Confirm Support for Renewal of Nuclear Deterrent
    Forest Fire Erupts Dangerously Close to Chernobyl Nuclear Plant
    US Policy Main Obstacle to Nuclear Weapon Reduction – Russian FM Official
    Tags:
    United States, false alarms, hackers, cyber threats, Cyber Attack, "de-alerting", high alert, nuclear missiles, nuclear arsenal, Minuteman III, Global Zero Commission, Nuclear Threat Initiative, Union of Concerned Scientists, John Cartwright, Russia
    Community standardsDiscussion
    Comment via FacebookComment via Sputnik