07:06 GMT23 June 2021
Listen Live
    Middle East
    Get short URL
    205
    Subscribe

    MOSCOW (Sputnik) - Rear Adm. Alexander Karpov, deputy head of the Russian Defense Ministry's Center for Reconciliation of Opposing Sides in Syria, said at a briefing that the Jabhat al-Nusra terrorist group* had shelled Syria's Idlib de-escalation zone 46 times over the past 24 hours.

    "Forty-six shelling attacks from the positions of the Jabhat al-Nusra terrorist group were registered in the Idlib de-escalation zone in the provinces of Idlib (23 attacks), Latakia (10), Aleppo (4) and Hama (9)," Rear Adm. Karpov said.

    He said the number of attacks according to the Syrian side's data totaled 43.

    Rear Adm. Karpov said no shelling on the part of illegal armed groups controlled by Turkey had been registered in the past day.

    He said Russian military police units continued to escort civilian vehicles on the M4 highway between the Raqqa and al-Hasakah provinces.

    The Russian Defense Ministry's Center for Reconciliation of Opposing Sides and Control over the Movement of Refugees in the Syrian Arab Republic was established in February 2016.

    Its tasks include the signing of agreements on illegal armed groups and individual settlements joining the regime of cessation of hostilities, as well as coordinating the delivery of humanitarian aid.


    *Jabhat al-Nusra (also known as Al-Nusra Front, Jabhat Fatah al-Sham, or al-Qaeda in Syria) is a terrorist group outlawed in Russia and many other states.

    Related:

    Denmark Pledges to Take Back, Punish Daesh Women From Prison Camps in Syria
    White Helmets, Nusra Preparing Provocations With Chemical Weapons in Syria, Russia Warns
    Unidentified Aircraft Attacks Targets on Syria-Iraq Border, Reports Say
    US, Allies Denounce Syria's Forthcoming May 26 Presidential Election as 'Neither Free Nor Fair'
    Tags:
    Russian center for Syrian reconciliation, Reconciliation Center, reconciliation, Russia, war in Syria, Syria crisis, Syrian war, Syria
    Community standardsDiscussion