17:04 GMT +318 October 2018
Listen Live
    This is an aerial view of the five-sided Pentagon building, headquarters of the United States Department of Defense, in Arlington, Va., in 1975

    US General Claims Russian S-300s Will Create 'Unstable Conditions' for Syria

    © AP Photo /
    Middle East
    Get short URL
    18156

    In a tension-filled House Armed Services Committee briefing, Pentagon officials were grilled regarding the ever-shifting rationale for Washington's presence in Syria now that jihadist militant groups are nearing defeat.

    Asked to assess the impact of the imminent transfer of Russia's S-300 air defense system to the Syrians on US and Israeli operations in and around Syria, Joint Staff deputy director Brig. Gen. Scott Benedict warned that it would increase the likelihood of "miscalculation."

    "The introduction of more of these systems only serves to create more unstable conditions and the likelihood of miscalculation such as which we tragically saw earlier in the week with the Russian plane being shot down by the Syrians," Benedict said, speaking to US lawmakers on Wednesday.

    "My greatest concern is that the more things we're putting in to this small area, particularly as we're starting to close in on the north part of Syria, the more dangerous the entire situation becomes because of the instability," the officer added.

    Mission Priorities

    In a tense exchange, Congressman Seth Moulton questioned Benedict on the US's strategic mission in Syria, suggesting that the administration seems to have conflicting priorities. "This week, [National Security Advisor] John Bolton suggested that the United States envisions a permanent presence in Syria to counter Iran, while Secretary [of Defense] James Mattis insisted our forces are only there to counter ISIS*," Moulton, a former Marine Corps officer, said.

    "When asked about the inconsistency, Secretary Mattis told the press they are on the 'same sheet of music.' … It is clear this is not the case," Moulton said. The US, he noted, seems to be "sending our military to Syria to counter Iran, especially because [the US troops'] withdrawal is apparently dependent on actions of Iran, not actions of ISIS or the defeat of ISIS."

    Asked to explain, Benedict insisted that the US forces' role in Syria remains "to defeat ISIS," but added that the US is also engaged in "stabilization," which "can contribute as part of the leverage to eventually get to a political settlement."

    Congressman Austin Scott had a question about the authorization required for the US Syria mission, asking assistant defense secretary of international security affairs Robert Karem whether the terrorists' presence in the country was sufficient for US military intervention. 

    "The idea that just because an organization by a certain name is in a country, that this gives us the ability to say, 'well because they're there, I've got the authorization to go do whatever I want to in that country' — I'm very concerned about the authorizations, and I think it deserves further discussion," Scott said.

    US 'Defense of Al-Qaeda'* in Syria

    Karem was also grilled by representative Tulsi Gabbard about why the US had threatened to launch a military operation against Damascus if the latter starts an operation to clear the Syrian province of Idlib of tens of thousands of al-Qaeda-linked terrorists. Idlib, she said, has been estimated by General Joseph Dunford to contain some 20,000-30,000 jihadists.

    "How is it in the national security interests of the United States that rather than going after Al-Qaeda and defeating al-Qaeda, the United States is making these threats, essentially acting as the protectors of al-Qaeda in Idlib?" Gabbard asked. 

    "How is this not a complete kick in the face and an insult to the American people, all of those lives that were lost on 9/11, first responders, our troops, their families, everyone who has sacrificed so much?" the Iraq War veteran congresswoman added.

    Karem disputed Gabbard's figures and claimed that Syria and Russia were responsible for the terrorist presence in Idlib.

    "There is no dispute that Idlib has become a hornet's nest for multiple terrorist organizations. Regrettably, this is the product of the Russian and regime approach to consolidating control on the ground in Syria. They have used the [de]escalation zones and locally negotiated deals to purge areas of Syria, and have used Idlib as a dumping ground," Karem said.

    S-300s

    Russia announced that it would provide Syria with the S-300 air defense system as part of its response to the destruction of a Russian Il-20 reconnaissance plane over the country last week with 15 airmen onboard. The Russian military accused the Israeli Air Force of callously using the Il-20 as a shield during an attack on targets in Syria, which led to the plane's accidental destruction by a Syrian air defense battery. As part of its response, Russia will also provide Syria with automatic control and management systems previously available only to the Russian Armed Forces, and provide it with the ability to jam satellite navigation, radar and communication systems of combat aircraft which attempt to strike targets over Syrian territory.

    * AKA Daesh, a terrorist group outlawed in Russia.

    * A terrorist organization outlawed in Russia and many other countries. Held responsible for the 9/11 terrorist attacks, which killed nearly 3,000 Americans in New York, Washington, DC, and Pennsylvania.

    Related:

    Russia's S-300 Supplies to Syria 'Long Overdue' - Geopolitical Analyst
    S-300 Deliveries May Help Deter Any Power to Strike Syria - Professor
    Russian S-300 Supplies to Deter Israel From Reckless Attacks on Syria - Official
    Tags:
    justification, strategy, geopolitics, S-300, Daesh, House Armed Services Committee, al-Qaeda, Scott Benedict, Seth Moulton, James Mattis, Tulsi Gabbard, Syria, United States, Russia
    Community standardsDiscussion
    Comment via FacebookComment via Sputnik
    • Сomment