10:34 GMT +317 October 2019
Listen Live
    1st Lt. Chris Richelderfer, Executive Officer of Headquarters and Headquarters Troop, 1st Squadron, 91st Cavalry Regiment (Airborne), looks at possible enemy positions during Operation Saray Has July 19 near Forward Operating Base Naray, Afghanistan.

    US Must 'Do Something Very Different' or Afghanistan Will Deteriorate

    CC BY 2.0 / The US Army
    Middle East
    Get short URL
    215
    Subscribe

    The head of US intelligence agencies has offered a harsh assessment of the progress of the US' long military involvement in Afghanistan. Dan Coats has told US legislators that even if the US government sends more troops as planned, the security situation will still "almost certainly" deteriorate.

    Through almost 16 years and three presidents, US-led troops have been mired in war, guerrilla factional disputes and "state building."

    At the annual assessment of threats to US national security, top intelligence officers offered a pessimistic forecast for the future of the US' longest war.

    Director of National Intelligence Dan Coats told the US Senate Intelligence Committee that US engagement in Afghanistan is heading to a scenario worse still than stalemate.

    "Afghan security forces' performance will probably worsen due to a combination of Taliban operations, combat casualties, desertions, poor logistics support, weak leadership," Mr. Coats said.

    "The political and security situation in Afghanistan will also almost certainly deteriorate through 2018, even with a modest increase in the military assistance by the US and its partners.

    "Afghanistan will struggle to curb its dependence on external support until it contains the insurgency or reaches a peace agreement with the Taliban," Coats said at a hearing of the Senate Intelligence Committee.

    It comes as unease among the US' allies is simmering over whether they should continue to commit more troops to the protracted war.

    Their key European backer, Germany, has signaled reservations about expanding their role with more troops.

    Meanwhile, although Australia has indicated that it is "open" to approving a NATO request for more troops, Prime Minister Malcolm Turnbull did not give a clear indication of his intentions at his recent visit to Afghanistan on April 24, 2017.

    "We are certainly open to increasing our work there, but we've obviously got to look at the commitments of the Australian Defense Force in other parts of the region and indeed in other parts of the world," Turnbull told reporters on Friday May 12.

    Australia currently has almost 300 troops stationed in Afghanistan.

    So, what next for President Trump's administration and its NATO allies?

    In February 2017, US General John Nicholson, the commander of foreign troops in Afghanistan, asked US legislators for a significant increase of 3,000 more US and NATO troops to fill a shortfall in training and advising roles.

    The US currently has about 8,400 troops in Afghanistan.

    And the US has previously, on multiple occasions, expressed its commitment to supporting local Afghan forces in their fight against extremism — through training and military support.

    In this July 24, 2016 file photo, a US military personal stands guard during a graduation ceremony for Afghan troops, in Lashkargah, capital of southern Helmand province, Afghanistan.
    © AP Photo / Abdul Khaliq
    In this July 24, 2016 file photo, a US military personal stands guard during a graduation ceremony for Afghan troops, in Lashkargah, capital of southern Helmand province, Afghanistan.

    However, some US military leaders are calling for bolder risks to be taken.

    On Thursday May 11, Defense Intelligence Agency Director Lt. Gen. Vincent Stewart — the head of the Pentagon's military intelligence agency — testified before the Senate Intelligence Committee.

    He called on the US to "do something very different" in Afghanistan, advising placing US military advisers closer to the front lines of battle.

    If such changes are not made, Stewart said, "the situation will continue to deteriorate and we'll lose all the gains we've invested in over the last several years."

    Defense Intelligence Agency Director USMC Lt. General Vincent Stewart waits to testify at a House (Select) Intelligence Committee hearing on World Wide Cyber Threats on Capitol Hill in Washington September 10, 2015
    © REUTERS / Gary Cameron
    Defense Intelligence Agency Director Lt. Gen. Vincent Stewart

    President Donald Trump has thus far not given a clear assessment of his foreign policy aims for Afghanistan.

    Since the US invasion in 2001, more than 2,200 US troops have lost their lives.

    If Director of National Intelligence Dan Coats' grim forecast of US involvement in Afghanistan comes true, their loss will likely be even harder to justify.

    Related:

    Taliban Terrorists Attack Security Forces Posts in Afghanistan, Get Punched Back
    Australia 'Open' to US Request for More Troops in Afghanistan
    Is Trump’s Rumored Afghanistan Troop Surge Just a Farce?
    NATO to Decide on Increasing Afghanistan Military Presence Within Weeks - Chief
    Tags:
    foreign troops, military presence, military support, Afghanistan War, Trump administration, NATO, US Armed Forces, Defense Intelligence Agency (DIA), US Senate Intelligence Committee, Taliban, Pentagon, Dan Coats, Vincent Stewart, Donald Trump, Afghanistan, Australia, United States, Middle East
    Community standardsDiscussion
    Comment via FacebookComment via Sputnik