17:32 GMT20 June 2021
Listen Live
    Middle East
    Get short URL
    Attack on UN Aid Convoy Near Aleppo (37)
    128
    Subscribe

    The International Federation of Red Cross and Red Crescent Societies (IFRC) is clarifying whether there are any victims and their possible numbers among the team members from a UN and Syrian Arab Red Crescent convoy, which was attacked while delivering aid in the Syrian city of Aleppo, a spokesman for the organization told Sputnik Tuesday.

    MOSCOW, September 20 (Sputnik) — On Monday, the United Nations’ Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs (OCHA) said that the aid convoy crossed the conflict line in the Big Orem area of Aleppo. Later in the day, UN officials stated that the convoy had been shelled and there were casualties.

    "We are still clarifying the situation with our team on the ground. We will issue a statement once we have additional information on that sometime this morning," Benoit Matsha-Carpentier said, commenting on the number of victims in the attack.

    Syria has been mired in civil war since 2011, with government forces fighting numerous opposition groups, as well as terrorist formations.

    Millions of Syrian people remain in urgent need of humanitarian aid, which cannot be delivered due to continuation of fighting. According to the United Nations, around two million people need humanitarian assistance in the Syrian city of Aleppo, which has been mired in intense fighting during the past several weeks.

    Topic:
    Attack on UN Aid Convoy Near Aleppo (37)

    Related:

    Attack on Humanitarian Convoy in Syria Leaves 'Many People' Dead
    US to Revise Prospects of Cooperation With Russia After Syria Aid Convoy Attack
    UN Convoy Waiting at Turkish Border to Deliver Aid to 80,000 People in E. Aleppo
    Turkish Humanitarian Convoy of 20 Trucks Crosses Syrian Border
    Tags:
    humanitarian convoy, The Syrian war, International Red Cross and Red Crescent Societies Federation (IFRC), Benoit Matsha-Carpentier, Syria, Aleppo
    Community standardsDiscussion