14:22 GMT +317 August 2019
Listen Live
    Fighters of the Manbij military council take an overwatch position in the southern rural area of Manbij, in Aleppo Governorate, Syria June 1, 2016

    Moscow Riyadh Rapprochement as a Possible Omen of End of Syrian Conflict

    © REUTERS / Rodi Said
    Middle East
    Get short URL
    7213

    The remaining fundamental differences between Moscow and Riyadh do not rule out their reconciliation in the coming weeks, which would be critical for a political solution to the Syrian crisis, especially when the US has almost lost its influence on its regional allies, according to World Bank consultant Olivier d'Auzon.

    “The fundamental differences between Moscow and Riyadh do not rule out a reconciliation between the two in the coming weeks, which would be critical for finding a political solution to the Syrian crisis,” Olivier d'Auzon, who is also an expert in Russian politics and the author of a book about Russian President Vladimir Putin, wrote in his article for the French edition of the US-based Huffington Post.

    The comments of the author come in reference to the meeting of Russia’s Deputy Minister of Foreign Affairs Mikhail Bogdanov with the members of the Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC) earlier in May, where he made a comment about a “far-reaching dialogue with colleagues on the Syrian issue.”

    He also referred to a recent comment of Adel al-Jubeir, the Saudi foreign minister, when he stressed that Riyadh is looking to strengthen its relations with Moscow.

    On the other hand, d'Auzon brought as an example the stalled Geneva talks on the Syrian issue and referred to the comments of Randa Kassis, representative of the Syrian secular opposition, who said that the absence of any results in Geneva should be attributed to the loss of the US influence on its regional allies.

    “In fact, Washington is no longer able to dictate terms to its Saudi and Turkish allies. Only Moscow is able to force a gradual but radical change on this issue," the author quotes Randa Kassis as saying recently.

    The author also notes that regardless of Barack Obama’s determination to separate the Ukrainian conflict issue and Iran’s nuclear issue from the developments in Syria, the US State Department “makes its utmost to obstruct any agreements with the Russians in Syria.”

    And part of this US administration is aligned with the radical positions of Ankara and Riyadh on the crisis and defends the doctrine of war of attrition.

    Regardless all the anti-Russian sanctions, Russia is now in a strong position, the author says, after it strengthened its presence in Syria in September 2015.

    And Washington is becoming aware that a convergence between Moscow and Riyadh is now “possible more than ever.”

    However there is still a strong point of discord between Saudi Arabia and Moscow, the author notes. And that is the resignation of President Assad, which Riyadh vehemently insists on. The Saudis fear Tehran’s policy and its growing influence in the region.

    In such a situation, he says, Moscow is able to find a balance between the Iranian’s and Saudi’s regional plans.

    If the Russians provide Riyadh with sufficient guarantees, the whole situation might probably change. However, there is one more player able to break the balance – it is the Turkish President Erdogan and his “neo-Ottoman expansionism".

    Related:

    Russia Cannot Ignore Threats From Syria, Libya, Iraq - MoD
    Stable Syria Vital in Eradicating Daesh After Raqqa Falls
    Tags:
    Geneva talks, rapprochement, reconciliation, peace process, Olivier d’Auzon, Moscow, United States, Russia, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
    Community standardsDiscussion
    Comment via FacebookComment via Sputnik