14:49 GMT +319 October 2019
Listen Live
    US Marines and Gunnary Sergeant Nate Cosby (R), Staff Sergeant Josh Lacey (2nd R) and Navy Hospitalman 2 Daniel Holmberg (L) from Border Adviser Team (BAT) and Explosive Ordance Disposal (EOD) 1st and 2nd Marine Division (Forward) walk through opium poppy field at Maranjan village in Helmand province on April 25, 2011 as they take patrol with their team and Afghanistan National Police

    Buckle Up! US Troops Doomed to Ten More Years in Afghanistan

    © AFP 2019 / Bay Ismoyo
    Middle East
    Get short URL
    12510
    Subscribe

    The presence of US troops in Afghanistan is a sticking point in the peace process but they will end up being there another five to ten years, Pakistani security analyst Rifaat Hussain told Sputnik.

    If US troops leave Afghanistan they will be leaving the country open to assault from the Taliban and from Daesh, but their presence is also a sticking point for political resolution, Rifaat Hussain, leading Pakistani security analyst, told Radio Sputnik.

    ​The Taliban has strengthened its presence in Afghanistan since the US withdrew combat troops from the country in 2014, and the deteriorating security situation means that US troops could be there for up to ten years, Hussain said.

    "The Americans are very quietly allowing their remaining troops, about 10,000, into a combat support role, and they are using drone attacks and aircraft to try and get the situation under control but it seems likely that Afghanistan will remain vulnerable to instability for the foreseeable future, and hence the Americans will be tempted to prolong their stay in Afghanistan much beyond 2017."

    "I would say that American troops are there to stay for a long period of time, maybe up to five or ten years," though the outcome of next year's US elections will also reflect whether the US public is willing to spend the necessary billions to keep a strategic foothold in the region, he said.

    The project to train and equip the US-backed Afghan military, with the existing level of troops, is projected to cost $10 billion alone, and taking on a greater combat role in Afghanistan would cost upwards of $30 billion, Hussain estimated.

    The presence of US troops is also having an effect on the "stillborn" Afghan peace process, which is hampered by the Taliban's demand for a definite time frame for the withdrawal of US troops before they come to the negotiating table.

    "On the other hand the Afghan unity government does not want the American forces to withdraw because they think that if the Americans were to pack up and leave, the Afghanistan unity government will be more likely to fall prey to the Afghan insurgency, and then Daesh will strengthen its foothold."

    "Some of the Afghan Taliban who are fighting the unity government forces are drifting more towards the Daesh element, so this means that Afghanistan will become more vulnerable to a civil war situation."

    "If that happens I am not sure that the Afghan army is going to stay as a united force, and more likely that they are going to split and throw their weight behind the winning force."

    The US-led NATO combat mission in Afghanistan formally ended in December 2014, and was replaced by the supposedly non-combat "Resolute Support" mission to train Afghan security forces. 

     US army and Afghan National Army (ANA) soldiers walk as a NATO helicopter flies overhead
    © AFP 2019 / WAKIL KOHSAR
    US army and Afghan National Army (ANA) soldiers walk as a NATO helicopter flies overhead
    Around 9,800 troops remained as part of that next mission, and their number was supposed to decrease by half by the end of 2015, and down to around 1,000 by the end of 2016.

    However, in October 2015 US President Barack Obama again reversed earlier announcements about the drawdown, and instead announced that almost 10,000 US troops will remain in the country throughout most of 2016. 

    On January 7, after US Special Forces came under fire from Afghan insurgents that killed one soldier and injured two more, Pentagon press secretary Peter Cook maintained that US troops were in "a combat situation," but not a combat role, The Hill reported.

    Cook said the special forces are operating in a "support backup" role for Afghan forces.

    "This is a combat situation, but they're not in the lead," the press secretary said.

    Related:

    Afghan Engineering Brigade Incapacitated Despite US Training Efforts
    Magnitude 5.2 Earthquake Occurs in Afghanistan, Near Border With Tajikistan
    Afghan Forces Liberate Over 30 Southern Villages From Militants
    Tags:
    troops, Afghanistan National Security Forces (ANSF), Taliban, US Armed Forces, Afghanistan, United States
    Community standardsDiscussion
    Comment via FacebookComment via Sputnik