“This is a case of raw, naked, brutal aggression by Saudi Arabia against Yemen,” Illinois University law professor Francis Boyle told Sputnik.
Boyle stressed military campaign against Yemen has nothing to do with international law.
“It is about the United States, by means of its proxies and puppets Saudi Arabia and the Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC), trying to reassert its control over Yemen because of its strategic location,” Boyle added.
The Saudi Arabian-led coalition, which consists of ten states including GCC members, began carrying out airstrikes against Yemen’s Houthi rebels in late March 2015, after ousted Yemeni President Abd Rabbuh Mansur Hadi called for intervention.
While not directly participating in the airstrikes, the United States is providing logistic and intelligence support for the offensive.
The coalition, has not sought authorization from the UN Security Council for the military campaign, and has justified the operation on the grounds that President Hadi requested the intervention.
Boyle explained that Hadi was placed in power the by a United States and GCC-brokered deal, no longer represents Yemen as he was ousted, resigned and fled the country in the context of a civil war.
“The only way there could be any type of lawful military intervention in Yemen is if it comes from the UN Security Council, and that so far hasn’t happened,” he said.
Boyle added that Article 2, Paragraph 7 of the UN Charter prohibits states from intervening in the internal matters of states unless there is a UN Security Council resolution authorizing military force.
“All these Gulf States and the United States that are now assisting Saudi Arabia are likewise guilty of the international crime of aggression against Yemen. The Arab League and GCC have no authority to authorize military attack on Yemen,” Boyle noted.
Charles Schmitz, a specialist on Yemen at Towson University, told Sputnik the Saudi intervention was a unilateral move to assert its military power in its neighborhood without UN backing.
“This is a Saudi action designed to assert its military power independent of the US,” Schmitz said. “The Saudi attack may not be defensible on strictly legal grounds, but politically the United States, the British and the French are going to back the Saudis in the UN Security Council.”
On Monday, Russian Foreign Sergei Lavrov said that without a UN Security Council resolution the Saudi military foray into Yemen is illegal.
Boyle noted, however, that Saudi Arabia, the GCC countries and even the United States could be held accountable for war crimes for the death of civilians, and for not allowing humanitarian supplies to enter the country.
Hundreds of civilians have been killed — including in airstrikes targeting a UN monitored refugee camp — as the Red Cross has called for a ceasefire amid warnings of a humanitarian catastrophe.