16:41 GMT11 April 2021
Listen Live
    Europe
    Get short URL
    MH17 Crash Investigation (261)
    925
    Subscribe

    The personal information of a witness in the MH17 case will not be disclosed at this stage in the process, a district court in The Hague said.

    The court ruled to keep 12 out of 13 witnesses anonymous, but declined a request for anonymity made by one of them.

    According to the court, the fact that the witness no longer has formal anonymity does not mean that their identity will be revealed. According to the court, the reason for the denial was that the witness did not have the opportunity to comment in the case, which is necessary for an investigative judge to make a ruling on whether someone is under threat or not.

    On Monday, the court examined the validity of the investigating judge’s decision to grant witness status to 13 persons, as they are considered to be under threat if their identities become known.

    Russian nationals Igor Girkin, Sergei Dubinsky, and Oleg Pulatov, as well as Ukrainian national Leonid Kharchenko are the defendants. Pulatov is represented by an international group, including two Dutch lawyers and one Russian lawyer, while the others are being tried in absentia. The hearings are scheduled to resume on 8 June.

    The hearings in the case of the MH17 crash in eastern Ukraine were held at the Schiphol Judicial Complex near Amsterdam from 9-10 March and at the District Court of The Hague on 28 March. Further hearings were postponed due to the coronavirus pandemic.

    MH17 Crash

    Malaysian Airlines Flight MH17 from Amsterdam to Kuala Lumpur with 298 people on board was shot down on 17 July 2014 in eastern Ukraine, leaving no survivors. Most of the deceased were Dutch citizens. The authorities in Kiev and the self-proclaimed republics in the Donbass have blamed each other for the downing of the aircraft.

    The US, the UK, and Australia have supported Kiev’s accusations and claimed that the airliner was shot down by a surface-to-air missile from an area controlled by forces of the self-proclaimed republics, which allegedly received the weapons from Russia.

    Following the deadly crash, the US and the EU imposed sanctions against Russia, which they claimed could be responsible for the tragedy.

    On 7 August 2014, a Dutch-led Joint Investigation Team (JIT) was created; Russia, however, was excluded from the international investigation for no reason.

    The JIT probe concluded that the plane was downed by a Buk missile, claiming that it came from the 53rd Anti-Aircraft Missile Brigade of the Russian Armed Forces, based near the city of Kursk. The Russian Foreign Ministry has strongly rejected the conclusions as groundless and called the investigation "biased".

    After conducting its own investigation with the help of Almaz-Antey, the defence firm that produced the Buk missile system, Moscow provided the JIT with evidence proving that MH17 was downed by a missile that has not been manufactured in Russia for a long time, but that is still in use in Ukraine. All the information provided by Russia has been ignored by the Dutch investigators.

    The JIT, meanwhile, announced in June 2019 the names of four suspects - three Russians and one Ukrainian citizen, claiming that the four individuals were accomplices in delivering a Buk missile system to a launch site in eastern Ukraine that was used to hit the Boeing.

    Topic:
    MH17 Crash Investigation (261)
    Tags:
    court, Netherlands, flight MH17, MH17, MH17 Crash
    Community standardsDiscussion